Oklahoma 2025 Regular Session

Oklahoma House Bill HB2159

Introduced
2/3/25  
Refer
2/4/25  
Refer
2/4/25  
Report Pass
2/27/25  
Engrossed
3/13/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Report Pass
4/7/25  
Enrolled
4/29/25  

Caption

Motor vehicles; defining terms; prohibiting the manufacture, importation, distribution, selling, or installation of certain supplemental restraint systems; effective date.

Impact

If enacted, HB 2159 would amend existing laws pertaining to motor vehicle safety by establishing clear definitions and prohibitions against counterfeit and nonfunctional airbag components. This could significantly enhance compliance with federal safety standards, as state enforcement of these provisions would deter the influx of substandard or fraudulent vehicle parts in Oklahoma. The bill is expected to strengthen consumer trust in vehicle safety measures, while also placing additional responsibilities on auto manufacturers and service providers to ensure compliance.

Summary

House Bill 2159 focuses on enhancing motor vehicle safety by specifically addressing the use of supplemental restraint systems, particularly airbags. This bill defines terms related to airbags and their components, explicitly prohibiting the manufacture, importation, distribution, and sale of devices that compromise the integrity of these safety systems. The intention behind this legislation is to ensure that only compliant and functional airbag systems are installed in vehicles, thus promoting the safety of vehicle occupants in the event of a crash.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2159 appears to be positive, particularly among advocates of motor vehicle safety and regulatory compliance. Lawmakers supporting the bill view it as a necessary step in safeguarding public safety by addressing the dangers posed by counterfeit and nonfunctional airbag systems. There may be concerns from certain industry stakeholders about increased regulatory burdens; however, the overall perception is that improving vehicle safety outweighs these potential drawbacks.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the practical enforcement of these regulations and how they may affect the automotive repair industry. Opponents could argue that while the bill aims to eliminate counterfeit parts, the definition of 'nonfunctional' could lead to ambiguity and disputes over compliance. Additionally, concerns may be raised about the economic impacts on businesses that may be disproportionately affected by strict enforcement of the new regulations. Ensuring clarity and support for the automotive service sector will be essential to mitigate these concerns.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB878

Juveniles: restraints.

NH SB393

Relative to the use of restraints on pregnant women in the custody of a state or county correctional facility.

CA AB2657

Pupil discipline: restraint and seclusion.

IL HB5631

MHDDC-LETHAL RESTRAINTS-PROHIB

CA AB216

School safety: Pupil and Staff Safety Pilot Program.

CO HB1248

Protect Students from Restraint & Seclusion Act

TX SB751

Relating to the use of restraints in state schools.

NH HB491

Relative to prohibiting the use of the prone restraint for minors.