Oklahoma 2025 Regular Session

Oklahoma House Bill HB2287

Introduced
2/3/25  
Refer
2/4/25  
Refer
2/4/25  
Report Pass
2/25/25  
Engrossed
3/12/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Report Pass
4/15/25  
Enrolled
5/7/25  

Caption

Education; per-pupil expenditure definition; effective date; emergency.

Impact

If enacted, HB 2287 would significantly impact how school districts in Oklahoma report their expenditures and could influence funding decisions at both state and local levels. The broadened definition may lead to more comprehensive data on school spending, which can be used to assess the efficiency and effectiveness of educational funding. The effective date is set for July 1, 2025, suggesting a transition period for schools to adapt to these changes in reporting requirements.

Summary

House Bill 2287 aims to amend the definition of 'per-pupil expenditure' in Oklahoma, broadening its scope to include various categories of educational spending. This bill specifies that per-pupil expenditure should encompass a wide range of operational costs for schools, such as instructional services, support services for students and staff, and operational maintenance, among others. By defining these categories explicitly, the bill seeks to provide clearer reporting and accountability regarding educational funding.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2287 appears to be generally positive among educational stakeholders. Proponents argue that clearer definitions of per-pupil expenditure can lead to enhanced transparency in how education funds are utilized, potentially helping to drive improvements in educational outcomes. However, there may also be concerns regarding the administrative burden this could place on local education authorities in terms of tracking and reporting these expenditures in the new format.

Contention

Despite its overall supportive sentiment, there are potential points of contention relating to the implementation and interpretation of the expanded definitions. Critics may argue that the bill could complicate existing funding formulas or obscure the allocation of resources by adding layers of administrative complexity. Furthermore, the designation of what constitutes appropriate expenditures could be debated, particularly in ensuring that the needs of diverse educational environments are met.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB321

Late signature curing expenditure reports.

CA AB2447

California State University: fiscal transparency: internet website.

AZ HB2364

Lobbyists; gift ban exemption

AZ HB2089

Community colleges; expenditure limitation

CA AB1052

The Financial Information System for California (FISCal).

CA AB62

State government: FI$Cal: transparency.

CA SB468

Taxation: tax expenditures: California Tax Expenditure Review Board.

CA SB768

Transportation projects: comprehensive development lease agreements.