Oregon 2022 Regular Session

Oregon Senate Bill SB1504

Introduced
2/1/22  
Refer
2/1/22  
Refer
2/4/22  
Refer
2/4/22  
Refer
2/11/22  
Report Pass
2/11/22  
Refer
2/11/22  
Report Pass
2/28/22  
Engrossed
3/2/22  
Refer
3/2/22  
Report Pass
3/3/22  
Enrolled
3/3/22  
Passed
3/24/22  
Chaptered
4/1/22  

Caption

Relating to greyhound racing; and prescribing an effective date.

Impact

The implications of SB 1504 are significant as it directly impacts the regulatory environment for animal racing in the state. By preventing new greyhound racing events and wagering, the bill reflects a shift in public sentiment against such practices, aligning with animal welfare advocates who argue that greyhound racing is cruel and detrimental to the dogs involved. This legislative change signifies a step towards greater consideration for animal rights within state law, potentially influencing similar initiatives in other jurisdictions.

Summary

Senate Bill 1504 prohibits the acceptance of wagers and provision of gambling services related to greyhound racing in Oregon. It establishes penalties for violations, including imprisonment and fines, and mandates the Oregon Racing Commission to provide an annual report on greyhound race wagers within the state. Furthermore, the bill includes provisions to eliminate licenses for greyhound race meets after the effective date, aiming to halt a practice that many view as outdated and inhumane towards animals involved in the racing industry.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB 1504 appears to be predominantly positive among animal rights groups and members of the public who oppose greyhound racing. Supporters argue that the ban on wagering signifies progress in recognizing the welfare of racing animals. However, there are opponents, including some who participate in horse racing and gambling industries, who may view the bill as an infringement on personal freedoms and a challenge to their economic interests, reflecting a polarized view on the issue.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise surrounding the economic impact on the racing industry and the livelihoods of those who work within it. While proponents argue that the cessation of greyhound racing is a moral imperative, opponents voice concerns about the potential loss of jobs related to the industry. The bill's passage represents not only a legal change but also a cultural shift regarding the treatment and perception of animals used in entertainment, prompting ongoing debates about animal rights versus economic interests.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB5013

Relating to the Texas Racing Commission and the regulation of dog races, including greyhound races, as live events in this state and of simulcast wagering on greyhound races conducted out of state.

WV HB5508

Relating to requiring certain transfers and disbursement of funds

US HB3894

Greyhound Protection Act of 2023

AR HB1721

To Amend Sections Of The Arkansas Code To Prohibit Greyhound Racing And Simulcasting Of Greyhound Racing.

CO HB1041

Prohibit Wagering On Simulcast Greyhound Races

TX HB4757

Relating to eligibility for membership on and the regulation of horse racing by the Texas Racing Commission and a prohibition on the conduct of greyhound or other dog racing as live events in this state; creating a criminal offense; authorizing a fee.

TX HB4115

Relating to eligibility for membership on and the regulation of horse racing by the Texas Racing Commission and a prohibition on the conduct of greyhound or other dog racing as live events in this state; creating a criminal offense; authorizing a fee.

AR HJR1019

An Amendment To The Arkansas Constitution To Remove References To Greyhound Racing From Arkansas Constitution, Amendment 100.