Oregon 2023 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB2292

Introduced
1/9/23  
Refer
1/11/23  
Report Pass
2/1/23  
Engrossed
2/9/23  
Refer
2/13/23  
Report Pass
6/21/23  
Enrolled
6/24/23  
Passed
7/18/23  
Chaptered
7/26/23  

Caption

Relating to a right of rescission in contracts for landscaping work; and prescribing an effective date.

Impact

The passage of HB 2292 means significant changes to the contractual landscape for landscaping services in Oregon. The bill adds provisions to existing laws governing landscaping contracts, making it mandatory for landscape contractors to notify customers about their right to rescind the contract at the time of signing. This is expected to enhance consumer confidence in engaging landscaping services, ensuring that clients are no longer locked into agreements without the chance to review or reconsider. The bill's stipulation for written notice of rescission is aimed at providing clarity and structure in transaction processes within the landscaping industry.

Summary

House Bill 2292 is focused on establishing a consumer's right to rescind contracts specifically for landscaping work. This legislative measure allows individuals who enter into written agreements with landscape contracting businesses to cancel such contracts within three business days of execution. The bill aims to empower consumers by offering a safeguard against immediate financial commitments, providing them an opportunity to reconsider their decisions after entering a contract. To invoke the right of rescission, consumers must provide written notice to the landscape contracting business, setting a clear procedure for exercising this right.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 2292 appears to be positive, particularly among consumer advocacy groups. Supporters of the bill champion it for bolstering consumer protection laws and for promoting fair business practices in the landscaping sector. However, some concerns were raised regarding the practicality of the rescission process, with critics arguing that it might slow down business operations or create uncertainty for service providers regarding pending agreements. Despite these critiques, the general perception of the bill remains favorable, noted for its intent to better protect consumer interests.

Contention

While HB 2292 received bipartisan support, it also sparked discussions regarding its potential implications for business operations within the landscaping industry. Opponents voiced that the bill could introduce administrative burdens for landscape contractors, especially small businesses that may struggle with increased regulatory measures. Nevertheless, advocates argue that the benefits of enhanced consumer protection outweigh these concerns, positing that maturing the market with such consumer-friendly policies is essential for promoting both ethical business practices and customer satisfaction in the long run.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

OR SB864

Relating to bonding requirements for landscape contracting businesses.

OR SB865

Relating to work performed by a landscape contracting business; and prescribing an effective date.

CA SB608

Architects and landscape architects.

NJ A581

Provides for licensure of landscape professionals and registration of professional landscaping businesses.

NJ S3010

Provides for licensure of landscape professionals and registration of professional landscaping businesses.

NJ A1466

Provides for licensure of landscape professionals and registration of professional landscaping businesses.

NJ S2285

Provides for licensure of landscape professionals and registration of professional landscaping businesses.

NJ S3710

Authorizes enforcement of landscape irrigation law by local enforcing agency and increases penalties.