Oregon House Bill HB2452

Oregon 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/23
• Refer: 1/12/23
• Failed: 6/25/23

Caption

Relating to the Department of Justice.

Impact

The bill amends the existing laws relating to the Department of Justice and specifically prohibits the imposition of charges for legal assistance. By reclassifying the way expenditures related to legal services are handled, the bill aims to reduce any bureaucratic hurdles that state officers face when obtaining necessary legal advice and representation. The measure not only simplifies the payment structure but also reinforces the role of the Department of Justice in supporting the state's legal needs without financial impediments.

Summary

House Bill 2452 is designed to prohibit the Oregon Department of Justice from imposing charges on state government officers and agencies for the legal assistance that it renders. The bill mandates that the department cover these costs from its appropriated funds, which will become effective on July 1, 2025. This legislative change is intended to streamline the financial processes within state agencies while ensuring that legal support is readily available without direct costs to the entities it serves.

Sentiment

The sentiment toward HB 2452 appears to be generally supportive among lawmakers advocating for efficient government operations. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the potential financial implications this may have on the Department of Justice's budget. While proponents argue that it will enhance access to legal services for state officers, critics may question the long-term viability of such a funding model without additional appropriations to cover the increased operational costs.

Contention

Discussions around HB 2452 highlight points of contention regarding the appropriateness of collective bargaining agreements related to attorney billing practices within the Department of Justice. The bill stipulates that the department cannot enter into or renew collective bargaining agreements that are based on hours billed by attorneys. This provision has sparked debate about how legal professionals within the department are evaluated and compensated, raising questions about fairness and accountability in state legal services.