Oregon 2023 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB2655

Introduced
1/9/23  
Refer
1/13/23  

Caption

Relating to aquaculture.

Impact

Through the implementation of this bill, existing laws and regulations governing aquaculture will be amended, creating stricter guidelines for facilities involved in the farming of aquatic animals. Key measures include requirements for environmental enrichment, humane handling, transport, and slaughtering practices designed to minimize stress and suffering among aquatic animals. The bill aims to prevent pollution and ensure water quality through more rigorous operational standards, which reflects a commitment to maintaining the ecological integrity of aquatic environments.

Summary

House Bill 2655 establishes new regulations regarding aquaculture practices in the state of Oregon. The bill outlines specific requirements to ensure the humane treatment of farmed aquatic animals and includes provisions for an Aquatic Animals Fund. This fund is intended to support the implementation of the bill's provisions and activities that promote the welfare of aquatic animals and aquatic plant agriculture. A civil penalty structure is introduced for violations of these requirements, which can result in significant fines or imprisonment for noncompliance.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2655 appears to be balancing the interests of sustainable aquaculture practices with the importance of animal welfare and environmental protection. Proponents of the bill argue that it is a progressive step towards better management of aquaculture facilities and the ethical treatment of aquatic life, while critics may raise concerns about the feasibility of implementing such regulations and their potential impact on small-scale aquaculture businesses. Nonetheless, the dialogue indicating a desire for more responsible and humane aquaculture practices has gained momentum within both legislative and public discussions.

Contention

Key points of contention regarding HB 2655 include the potential economic impact on smaller aquaculture operations due to heightened regulatory requirements and the fear that stringent regulations might limit access to the industry for new entrants. While advocates argue that these measures are essential for guaranteeing high standards of animal welfare and ecological sustainability, opponents might express concerns regarding the added financial burden and operational restrictions that could arise for well-established and smaller facilities. The balance between safeguarding natural resources and enabling economic viability in the aquaculture sector is a central theme of the ongoing debate.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

OR SB89

Relating to aquaculture.

OR HB2965

Relating to aquaculture.

OR HB1724

Relating To Aquaculture.

OR SB2284

Relating To Aquaculture.

OR SB2285

Relating To Aquaculture.

OR HB1723

Relating To Aquaculture.

OR HB488

Relating To Aquaculture.

OR HB488

Relating To Aquaculture.

OR SB115

Relating To Aquaculture.

OR SB115

Relating To Aquaculture.

Similar Bills

OR SB89

Relating to aquaculture.

UT HB0423

Department of Agriculture and Food Amendments

AZ HB2762

Agricultural vaccinations; disclosure; prohibition

AZ HB2406

Agriculture; hemp; regulation; vaccination; disclosure

AZ SB1146

Disclosure; agricultural vaccinations; prohibition

AZ SB1648

Agricultural vaccinations; disclosure.

LA HCR21

Memorializes the United States Congress to review and enact the Processing Revival and Intrastate Meat Exemption Act

OR HB2965

Relating to aquaculture.