Oregon 2023 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB2800

Introduced
1/9/23  
Refer
1/16/23  

Caption

Relating to age-based employment discrimination.

Impact

The proposed law modifies existing Oregon statutes related to employment discrimination, specifically ORS 659A.030 and 659A.885. By making inquiries about an applicant's age during the hiring process illegal, it seeks to create a more equitable environment in which individuals are evaluated based on their qualifications rather than their age. Furthermore, the bill permits legal actions against employers who violate these provisions, thus enhancing employee protections against age-related discrimination.

Summary

House Bill 2800 addresses age-based employment discrimination by clarifying the definition of 'because of age' in employment law. It prohibits employers from inquiring about an applicant's age before an initial interview or a conditional job offer. The bill aims to prevent age discrimination during the hiring process by ensuring that age-related biases do not influence hiring decisions. Additionally, the bill allows employers to ask about an applicant's age under certain conditions, such as when age is a bona fide occupational qualification. It also removes other provisions related to apprentices from the scope of unlawful employment discrimination statutes.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 2800 appears to be largely supportive among legislators advocating for equal employment opportunities. Advocacy groups and stakeholders who focus on civil rights and workplace equality are likely to view the bill positively, as it addresses a significant issue of age discrimination in hiring practices. However, concerns may arise from businesses that worry the changes will complicate the hiring process or restrict their ability to determine the best candidate for a job based on age-related qualifications.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between protecting older workers from discrimination and allowing employers to make informed decisions regarding their workforce. Critics may argue that while the bill intends to prevent age discrimination, it could unintentionally hinder businesses' ability to assess an applicant's suitability based on job-related age criteria. The bill's language, which allows for certain inquiries under specific circumstances, may also lead to confusion about what constitutes acceptable practices during the hiring process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

OR HB3050

Relating to discrimination based on medical history; prescribing an effective date.

OR SB1571

Relating to discrimination based on medical history; prescribing an effective date.

OR SB638

Relating to employment discrimination based on vaccination status.

OR HB2944

Relating to discrimination based on medical history; declaring an emergency.

OR HB3501

Relating to rights of persons experiencing homelessness; prescribing an effective date.

OR HB4069

Relating to discrimination based on medical history; declaring an emergency.

OR SB717

Relating to mandatory immunizations for certain health care employees.

OR HB2476

Relating to the repeal of certain provisions related to pay equity; declaring an emergency.