The amendment of ORS 327.077 will allow for calculated financial assistance based on the adjusted average daily membership (ADMa) for both elementary and high schools. This means that schools classified as remote small schools may receive additional funding if they meet specific criteria, such as low average daily memberships. As a result, the bill reinforces the foundation for additional operational funds to support the educational needs of smaller populations, which may be disproportionately affected by financial constraints.
Summary
House Bill 3135 aims to provide enhanced funding for small school districts by establishing new provisions and amending existing statutes related to educational funding. One of the primary intentions of this bill is to ensure that small districts, particularly those with remote elementary and small high schools, receive adequate financial support from the state. It introduces changes to how funding is allocated, particularly through grants that would be provided for each small high school operated by a district, thus promoting educational equity across different school sizes.
Sentiment
The sentiment around HB 3135 appears largely positive, with supporters praising it for addressing the funding disparities faced by small school districts. Legislators and educational advocates see this as a crucial step toward leveling the playing field for students who attend smaller schools, ensuring they have access to similar resources and opportunities as those in larger districts. However, there is potential concern from some quarters regarding the adequacy of the funding levels and whether the formula applied will truly suffice to meet the varied needs of these schools.
Contention
There may be points of contention surrounding how the funding formula is structured and whether the changes adequately reflect the operational realities of small and rural school districts. Critics might argue that the thresholds set for receiving additional funding could exclude certain schools that need financial assistance. Furthermore, discussions regarding the implementation of the new funding model may reveal varying opinions on its practicality and efficiency, particularly as the bill affects different geographic and demographic contexts.