Oregon 2023 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB3382

Introduced
2/28/23  
Refer
3/3/23  
Refer
5/23/23  
Refer
5/23/23  
Report Pass
6/2/23  
Engrossed
6/15/23  
Refer
6/15/23  
Report Pass
6/21/23  
Enrolled
6/24/23  
Passed
7/31/23  
Chaptered
8/15/23  

Caption

Relating to ports; and declaring an emergency.

Impact

The passage of HB 3382 is seen as significant for local governments and public ports, particularly for enhancing navigation infrastructure to support economic growth and maritime operations. The bill emphasizes the balance between development and environmental protection by setting stringent conditions for projects, including comprehensive consultation with local tribes and preservation protocols for archaeological sites. As a result, the legislation modifies existing frameworks to integrate economic development with sustainable practices concerning estuarine ecosystems.

Summary

House Bill 3382 addresses the necessity of improvements to deep draft navigation channels, allowing local governments in Oregon to adopt exceptions to land use planning goals specifically related to estuarine resources. The bill is designed to facilitate the redesignation and rezoning of natural and conservation areas within development estuaries in a way that mitigates adverse impacts on estuarine resources and habitats. It enables public ports or eligible Indian tribes to apply for improvement projects, providing guidance and requirements for necessary reporting and mitigation efforts to maintain ecological balance.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 3382 is generally positive among proponents who view it as a necessary step toward revitalizing local ports and waterways, thus boosting job creation and economic activities in the region. However, there are reservations expressed by some environmental advocates who worry that the urgency of infrastructure projects might compromise ecological safeguards. The discussions indicate a broader conflict between development goals and the imperative of protecting natural resources.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance of development interests with environmental protection imperatives. Critics are concerned that while the bill allows for expedient improvements to navigational channels, it could lead to a relaxation of regulations concerning the preservation of sensitive estuarine environments. The bill aims to keep regulatory oversight in check, which underscores the ongoing tension in managing local resources while accounting for economic advantages proposed by such infrastructure enhancements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

OR SB5531

Relating to lottery bonds; and declaring an emergency.

OR HB5030

Relating to lottery bonds; and declaring an emergency.

OR SB00376

An Act Concerning The Coastal Management Act And Shoreline Flood And Erosion Control Structures.

OR SB273

Tidelands and submerged lands: City and County of San Francisco: Piers 30-32: mixed-use development.

OR SB00078

An Act Concerning The Disposition Of Dredged Materials From Certain Harbors And Ports On Long Island Sound.

OR HB5201

Relating to state financial administration; declaring an emergency.

OR HB3580

Relating to eelgrass resources in state waters; declaring an emergency.

OR HB06354

An Act Authorizing Hardened Structures Below The High-tide Line For Living Shoreline Purposes.

OR HB05128

An Act Concerning Certain Revisions To The Coastal Zone Management Statutes.

OR HB4068

Relating to emergency preparedness; and declaring an emergency.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.