Oregon Senate Bill SB637

Oregon 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/23
• Refer: 1/15/23
• Failed: 6/25/23

Caption

Relating to the handling of ballots.

Impact

If enacted, SB 637 would amend existing Oregon voting laws by tightening regulations around the handling of ballots. The bill seeks to centralize and streamline the ballots' return process, which may lead to fewer instances of illicit ballot handling. Advocates argue that these measures are essential for maintaining public trust in election outcomes and ensuring that votes are accurately represented. There would also be an associated requirement for ballot collectors to deposit ballots within two days of collection, further ensuring a timely return process.

Summary

Senate Bill 637 prohibits individuals from collecting and returning another person's ballot, with specific exceptions. The bill establishes that each elector must return their own ballot, ensuring that voters directly handle their votes. The allowed exceptions apply to individuals who are either relatives of the voter, members of the voter's household, or paid caregivers who provide ongoing care. This legislation aims to enhance the integrity of the ballot collection process and reduce the potential for electoral fraud.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 637 has been mixed. Supporters, including some election integrity advocates, view the bill as a necessary step toward safeguarding voter rights and election processes. They argue that limiting who can collect ballots makes it less likely for individuals to be pressured into voting a certain way. On the other hand, critics, particularly from voter advocacy groups, express concerns that the bill may disenfranchise voters who rely on assistance for ballot collection, particularly the elderly or disabled, thus limiting their voting rights.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions regarding who qualifies as a 'relative' and whether the bill adequately considers individuals with disabilities. Critics assert that the restrictions could disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, who may depend on friends or community members to ensure their votes are cast. The balance between preventing electoral fraud and ensuring access to voting for all citizens has sparked significant debate among legislators and advocacy groups alike.