Oregon Senate Bill SB835

Oregon 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/2/23
• Refer: 2/3/23
• Report Pass: 3/29/23
• Refer: 3/29/23
• Report Pass: 6/15/23
• Engrossed: 6/21/23
• Refer: 6/21/23
• Report Pass: 6/22/23
• Enrolled: 6/22/23
• Passed: 7/18/23
• Chaptered: 8/1/23
• Passed: 8/1/23

Caption

Relating to subsurface sewage disposal.

Impact

If passed, SB835 will significantly impact the state's approach to waste management and housing development. The amendments made to ORS 454.605 will establish guidelines on the proper implementation of shared sewage disposal systems for both single-family dwellings and accessory units. Advocates argue that this could enhance the efficiency of sewage management, help mitigate public health risks associated with improper waste disposal, and support sustainable growth in residential housing. It promotes better utilization of existing property without necessitating extensive infrastructure changes.

Summary

Senate Bill 835 addresses the regulations surrounding subsurface sewage disposal systems in the state of Oregon. The primary focus of the bill is to authorize the Environmental Quality Commission to adopt rules that would specify the conditions under which an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) situated on the same lot as a single-family dwelling can be permanently connected to the same sewage disposal system. This legislation seeks to streamline the process for homeowners wishing to connect both their primary and additional residential units to a single sewage system, thereby potentially easing housing shortages by encouraging the development of ADUs.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB835 may revolve around environmental concerns regarding wastewater management and local government authority. Critics might question whether allowing dual connections to a single sewage system adequately addresses potential public health hazards associated with effluent management. Additionally, there may be apprehensions regarding compliance with state environmental laws, as well as the capability of existing systems to handle increased loads. Discussions may also highlight the need for local governments to retain some regulatory power in the face of streamlined state mandates.