Oregon 2023 Regular Session

Oregon Senate Bill SB867

Introduced
2/9/23  
Refer
2/9/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Engrossed
3/27/23  
Refer
3/28/23  
Report Pass
5/8/23  
Enrolled
5/18/23  
Passed
5/30/23  
Chaptered
6/2/23  

Caption

Relating to forfeiture by wrongdoing.

Impact

If enacted, SB867 would amend existing statutes related to the forfeiture process, specifically targeting instances where a person’s wrongful conduct could be used to justify the retention of assets. This change reflects a growing consensus among legislators about the need to reform asset forfeiture laws to safeguard the integrity of the justice system. The bill aims to align state laws with principles of fairness and due process, ensuring that wrongdoers are not able to exploit the system for personal gain.

Summary

Senate Bill 867 addresses the issue of forfeiture by wrongdoing, implementing measures to ensure that individuals cannot benefit from their illegal actions through the forfeiture of assets. This legislation is a significant reform in criminal justice, aiming to prevent wrongdoers from retaining assets that are connected to criminal behavior. By enforcing stricter regulations on asset forfeiture, the bill seeks to enhance accountability within the legal process and promote justice for victims of crime.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB867 appears broadly positive among legislators, with many expressing support for the bill during discussions. Advocates of the legislation argue that it represents a necessary step toward more equitable asset forfeiture practices that align with public safety and justice. The legislation has garnered bipartisan backing, reflecting a shared recognition of the importance of limiting the potential misuse of forfeiture laws.

Contention

While SB867 has received significant support, there remains some contention regarding its enforcement and implications for law enforcement agencies. Critics express concerns that the bill may complicate the process of asset recovery for law enforcement, potentially hindering their ability to fund crucial initiatives through seized assets. Nevertheless, proponents argue that the bill’s reforms are essential for upholding ethical standards and ensuring that the justice system operates fairly.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

OR LD836

An Act to Codify Forfeiture by Wrongdoing as an Exception to the Rule Against Hearsay

OR SB589

Relating to hearsay.

OR SB317

Relating to hearsay; and declaring an emergency.

OR HB3819

Relating to the State Board of Massage Therapists; and prescribing an effective date.

OR SB377

Provides for the burden of proof to introduce evidence under the "forfeiture of wrongdoing" exception to hearsay. (8/15/10)

OR SB72

Adding an exception to the hearsay rule to allow admission of statements made to a translator without the testimony of the translator.

OR SB127

Expanding the hearsay exception for statements made to a physician to all healthcare providers.

OR AJR99

Clarifies exception to hearsay rule concerning medical diagnosis or treatment for purposes of providing, continuing, or ending mental health services.

OR AJR108

Clarifies exception to hearsay rule concerning medical diagnosis or treatment for purposes of providing, continuing, or ending mental health services.

OR SB149

Relating To Property Forfeiture.

Similar Bills

CA AB1170

Political Reform Act of 1974: filing requirements.

CA AB2051

Candidate’s statement.

CA AB2679

Fictitious business names: statements: publication.

CA AB515

Trial: statement of decision.

CA SB632

Vehicles: off-highway recreation: Red Rock Canyon State Park.

TX SB2221

Relating to the filing of a fraudulent financing statement in relation to certain secured transactions; authorizing the imposition of a fee.

TX HB5377

Relating to the filing of a fraudulent financing statement in relation to certain secured transactions; authorizing the imposition of a fee.

CA AB750

Crimes: perjury.