Oregon House Bill HB2032

Oregon 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/13/25
• Refer: 1/17/25

Caption

Relating to age verification requirements for access to sexual material harmful to minors.

Impact

If enacted, HB 2032 will directly influence how companies handle access to sexual content online, necessitating the implementation of reliable methods for age verification. Failure to comply with these requirements can lead to liability claims, potentially costing businesses up to $5,000 for each violation where minors are exposed to harmful content. This approach not only holds businesses accountable but also underscores the legal obligations to protect children from inappropriate material on the internet.

Summary

House Bill 2032 seeks to establish stringent age verification requirements for businesses that publish or distribute sexual material deemed harmful to minors. The bill mandates that commercial entities must verify the ages of individuals accessing such content and prohibits access to anyone under the age of 18. By imposing a requirement to delete any identifying information collected during this verification, the bill aims to safeguard personal data and ensure that minors do not encounter harmful material online.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2032 is largely supportive among legislators concerned with child safety, as many view it as a crucial step toward protecting minors from exposure to harmful sexual content. However, there are also concerns voiced by civil liberties groups regarding the potential overreach of regulation and implications for internet freedom. Critics argue that such regulations may burden businesses and pose challenges related to privacy and the feasibility of effective compliance.

Contention

Notable points of contention include debates over how to define 'sexual material harmful to minors,' as the bill's language could be subject to varying interpretations. Additionally, the ability of businesses to reliably verify ages without infringing on users' privacy rights remains a significant concern. The balance between ensuring child protection and safeguarding civil liberties will likely fuel ongoing discussions as the bill progresses through the legislative process.