Relating to surveys conducted by state agencies.
If passed, HB2105 would reform existing procedures concerning how state agencies handle external surveys. Specifically, it would introduce a legal obligation for timely reporting to the legislative assembly, ensuring that legislators are promptly informed about public feedback collected by state agencies. The bill emphasizes the necessity of surveys as a data collection approach while providing a structure for future survey-related activities by state government bodies.
House Bill 2105 focuses on the requirement for state agencies to report to the legislature when they conduct external surveys. The bill aims to enhance transparency by mandating that survey results be presented to lawmakers within three business days after the agency receives them. This initiative is envisioned to provide a clearer understanding of public opinions and sentiments on various issues that state agencies address, ultimately fostering better decision-making based on gathered data. The bill is positioned as a step towards improved governmental accountability.
The general sentiment surrounding HB2105 appears to be positive among lawmakers who advocate for increased transparency and accountability in government operations. Proponents believe that making survey results accessible to the legislature will empower elected officials with crucial information reflecting the views of their constituents. On the other hand, there may be some concerns regarding the potential added workload for state agencies and the implications of such reporting requirements on their ongoing operations.
Notable points of contention may revolve around the logistics of implementing the survey reporting requirement, including how it might affect state agency resources and operational efficiency. Critics may argue that the bill could impose undue burdens on agencies that are already stretched thin, impacting their ability to carry out their mandates effectively. Additionally, as agencies adapt to this new requirement, there could be debates about the quality and scope of the surveys being conducted, ensuring that they adequately capture the diverse opinions within the state.