Relating to land use; declaring an emergency.
The potential impact of HB 2138 is significant, as it seeks to expand allowable housing types and density restrictions, which could transform urban landscapes. By prohibiting private restrictions that limit middle housing, the bill could encourage a greater variety of housing options, including single room occupancies and accessory dwelling units. Furthermore, by expediting land division processes and reducing bureaucratic hurdles, the bill may significantly increase housing supply in areas experiencing rapid growth.
House Bill 2138 focuses on revising land use regulations to promote increased housing density, particularly through middle housing developments. The bill allows for denser home building in cities and unincorporated urban areas, while establishing specific requirements for local governments to implement changes, with deadlines set for compliance. It also aims to reduce restrictions on middle housing and accessory dwelling units, facilitating a more responsive development process to address the housing shortage in urbanized areas.
The sentiment surrounding House Bill 2138 is mixed. Advocates view the bill as a critical step toward addressing Oregon's housing crisis and promoting equitable housing opportunities. They argue that increasing density is essential for accommodating growing populations and making housing more attainable. Conversely, some local governments and citizens express concern that the bill undermines local governance and the ability of communities to shape their development according to specific needs and preferences. This division reflects broader tensions between state-level mandates and local control over land use.
Notable points of contention include concerns about the retroactive application of the prohibition on private restrictions and the expedited land division provisions. Critics argue that the bill may inadvertently bypass important local input and consideration for community-specific needs, potentially leading to developments that fail to align with the character or infrastructure capabilities of certain neighborhoods. Additionally, the encouragement of middle housing raises questions about whether the necessary support structures—such as transportation, services, and infrastructure—will be adequately managed.