Oregon 2025 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB2541

Introduced
1/13/25  
Refer
1/17/25  
Report Pass
3/28/25  
Engrossed
4/3/25  
Refer
4/3/25  
Report Pass
4/22/25  
Enrolled
4/29/25  
Passed
5/7/25  
Chaptered
5/20/25  

Caption

Relating to rights of certain agricultural workers to express milk in the workplace; and declaring an emergency.

Impact

The enactment of HB 2541 will amend existing laws concerning workplace accommodations for nursing mothers, thereby adding clarity to the rights of agricultural workers. Employers will now be required by law to respect these needs, which can potentially lead to a shift in workplace culture towards more inclusive practices for breastfeeding. It reinforces the notion that employers have a responsibility to ensure the health and well-being of their employees and their families, particularly for those in the agricultural sector where such accommodations may have been lacking previously.

Summary

House Bill 2541 pertains to the rights of certain agricultural workers to express milk in the workplace. The bill requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations for employees needing to express milk for their children aged 18 months or younger. Specifically, it mandates that employers designate private locations, apart from public restrooms, for this purpose and allow reasonable unpaid rest periods during work hours. This amendment emphasizes the importance of supporting working parents and providing a conducive environment for breastfeeding in the workplace.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 2541 appears to be generally supportive among legislators, particularly those advocating for workers' rights and family-friendly policies. Advocacy groups for maternal and child health are likely to view this legislation positively as it directly enhances support for nursing mothers. However, there might be reservations from some employers, especially smaller businesses, regarding the potential administrative burden and perceived impact on operations, which indicates a spectrum of opinions on the bill.

Contention

While the bill has provisions that are widely supported, there remains contention regarding the definition of 'reasonable efforts' and what circumstances constitute an 'undue hardship' for employers, particularly for small businesses. Critics may argue that the legislation could inadvertently create challenges, particularly in businesses where resources and space are limited. Furthermore, discussions may arise regarding the implementation of the enforced measures, as clarity on administrative rules and employer obligations is crucial for effective enforcement and compliance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

VT H0461

An act relating to expanding employee access to unpaid leave

NV SB434

Revises provisions related to retirement. (BDR 23-16)

VT S0130

An act relating to miscellaneous employee rights and protections

VT H0298

An act relating to miscellaneous employee rights and protections

VT H0033

An act relating to expanding employee access to unpaid leave

OR SB468

Relating to employment agreements for health professionals.

NV SB308

Revises provisions relating to educational personnel. (BDR 23-1018)

OR HB3502

Relating to predictive work scheduling.