Oregon 2025 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB2564

Introduced
1/13/25  
Refer
1/17/25  
Report Pass
3/21/25  
Engrossed
3/27/25  
Refer
3/27/25  
Report Pass
5/7/25  
Enrolled
5/13/25  

Caption

Relating to the insurance rate review process.

Impact

One of the primary impacts of HB2564 is the introduction of a 30-day public comment period for each premium rate filing, promoting greater transparency and consumer involvement in the rate approval process. This public commentary is intended to help the department gauge community sentiments and potential concerns regarding proposed rate increases or changes to health benefit plans. Additionally, it ensures that the final governing decisions reflect a balance between insurer affordability and consumer protection.

Summary

House Bill 2564 (HB2564) focuses on enhancing the insurance rate review process in Oregon, particularly for health benefit plans affecting small employers and individuals. The bill mandates that all health insurers file detailed schedules or tables of premium rates that require approval from the Department of Consumer and Business Services. It establishes a framework where the department evaluates whether these premium rates are reasonable, not excessive, and actuarially sound, based on a comprehensive analysis of the insurer's financial stability and anticipated changes in enrollment and healthcare costs.

Sentiment

The general sentiment towards HB2564 appears to be positive, particularly among consumer advocacy groups and proponents of healthcare transparency. Supporters view the bill as a crucial step towards protecting consumers from potentially discriminatory pricing practices by health insurers, and they appreciate the emphasis on public input. Conversely, some insurance industry stakeholders express concerns that the regulations could lead to inefficiencies and increased operational costs, which may ultimately be passed down to consumers.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB2564 include the potential administrative burden imposed on insurers due to the stringent documentation and public engagement requirements. Critics argue that while the intent is to provide consumer protection, there is a risk that excessive regulation may impede insurers' capacity to set competitive premiums, which could adversely impact the availability and variety of health plans in the market. Furthermore, discussions highlighted the balance needed between diligent oversight and the necessity for insurers to maintain profitability in a tightly regulated environment.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2557

Corporations: directors.

CA AB591

Central Basin Municipal Water District: board of directors.

CA SB387

Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency: board of directors.

CA AB1225

State parks: Accessibility Advisory Committee.

DE HB243

An Act To Amend Titles 16, 24, And 29 Of The Delaware Code Relating To The Department Of Health And Social Services.

CO HB1447

Transit Reform

HI SB2685

Relating To Planned Community Associations.

HI HB1781

Relating To Planned Community Associations.