Oregon 2025 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB2658

Introduced
1/13/25  
Refer
1/17/25  
Report Pass
4/11/25  
Engrossed
4/16/25  
Refer
4/21/25  
Refer
6/9/25  
Refer
6/9/25  
Report Pass
6/19/25  
Enrolled
6/23/25  

Caption

Relating to conditions of development.

Impact

The implementation of HB 2658 is expected to streamline the permit process for building alterations by reducing additional requirements placed on developers. By removing the obligation to carry out frontage improvements, it aims to facilitate renovations and potentially spur economic development within municipalities. However, it also sets a standard that could limit local governments' ability to require improvements that might enhance public infrastructure and safety.

Summary

House Bill 2658, titled 'Relating to conditions of development', primarily addresses the requirements municipalities impose on construction permits, specifically focusing on alterations to existing structures. The bill stipulates that municipalities with populations over 15,000 cannot require developers to make frontage improvements, such as roadway repairs or sidewalk installations, as a condition for obtaining a renovation permit, provided certain conditions are met. This includes ensuring that alterations do not increase the building’s footprint and remain under a cost cap set by the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2658 appears to be mixed, with proponents advocating for a more developer-friendly regulatory environment as a means to encourage construction and renovations. They argue that the bill simplifies the process and reduces unnecessary costs for developers. However, some opponents express concern that the removal of these local requirements could lead to less comprehensive development that does not adequately consider community needs, particularly regarding infrastructure improvements that benefit the public.

Contention

The central contention lies in the balance between state-level regulation and local government control. Critics argue that the bill undermines local authority by restricting municipalities from imposing regulations they see fit for managing growth and maintaining infrastructure standards. Proponents counter that the bill is essential for economic growth and reducing burdens on developers, which may ultimately foster more construction and urban renewal efforts.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

OR SB871

Relating to resilient efficient buildings; prescribing an effective date.

OR HB4040

Relating to economic development; declaring an emergency.

OR HB4042

Relating to economic development; prescribing an effective date.

OR HB3409

Relating to climate; and declaring an emergency.

OR HB3179

Relating to the permitting of renewable energy facilities.

OR HB3498

Relating to minimum conditions of employment.

OR HB3543

Relating to housing.

OR HB2041

Relating to apprenticeship.

OR SB316

Relating to correction of erroneous material in Oregon law.

OR HB2889

Relating to housing development; and declaring an emergency.

Similar Bills

HI HB1223

Relating To Capital Improvement Projects For The Benefit Of The Thirty-eighth Representative District.

HI SB1603

Relating To Capital Improvement Projects For The Benefit Of The Third Senatorial District.

HI SB3310

Relating To Capital Improvement Projects For The Benefit Of The Third Senatorial District.

HI SB1575

Relating To Capital Improvement Projects For The Benefit Of The Third Senatorial District.

HI SB1575

Relating To Capital Improvement Projects For The Benefit Of The Third Senatorial District.

HI HB2352

Relating To Capital Improvement Projects For The Benefit Of The Forty-first Representative District.

HI SB1408

Relating To Capital Improvement Projects For The Benefit Of The Third Senatorial District.

HI HB1369

Relating To Capital Improvement Projects For The Benefit Of The Forty-fifth Representative District.