Oregon 2025 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB3179

Introduced
1/13/25  
Refer
1/17/25  
Refer
4/9/25  
Refer
4/9/25  
Refer
5/23/25  
Refer
5/23/25  
Report Pass
6/19/25  
Engrossed
6/23/25  
Refer
6/23/25  
Report Pass
6/24/25  
Enrolled
6/24/25  

Caption

Relating to public utilities; and declaring an emergency.

Impact

If enacted, HB3179 would likely amend existing statutes regulating public utilities, particularly in how utilities prepare for and respond to emergencies. The bill specifies new operational guidelines that utilities would need to follow, potentially leading to increased operational costs but also aiming to prevent larger-scale emergencies that can arise from utility failures. Stakeholders believe that these changes will bolster state utility infrastructures, thereby enhancing their overall resilience and reliability.

Summary

House Bill 3179 addresses essential regulations surrounding public utilities with a particular emphasis on infrastructure and service maintenance standards. The bill is designed to streamline the response and operational protocols surrounding public utilities in the event of emergencies. Proponents assert that this bill will enhance public safety by ensuring that utilities can respond more rapidly and efficiently to disasters, thus minimizing service disruptions and safeguarding public health and welfare.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB3179 appears to be largely supportive among utility regulators and public safety advocates who see the legislation as a proactive approach to emergency preparedness. However, some fiscal conservatives have raised concerns over the costs incurred by implementing the new standards, warning that such regulations could lead to higher utility bills for consumers. These contrasting views reflect a broader debate on the balance between proactive public safety measures and economic implications for residents.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between safety protocols and the financial implications for utility companies and their customers. Critics argue that the increased regulatory framework may lead to a significant rise in operational costs, which could be passed on to consumers. Supporters, on the other hand, contend that investment in infrastructure and preparedness measures is crucial to preventing larger problems that may arise in emergency situations, thus justifying the potential increase in costs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

OR HB3111

Relating to public records; and declaring an emergency.

OR HB3409

Relating to climate; and declaring an emergency.

OR HB4031

Relating to public records; declaring an emergency.

OR HB2002

Relating to health; and declaring an emergency.

OR HB2001

Relating to housing; and declaring an emergency.

OR HB4149

Relating to pharmacy benefits; declaring an emergency.

OR SB1525

Relating to the State Department of Energy; declaring an emergency.

OR SB870

Relating to resilient efficient buildings; declaring an emergency.

OR HB3143

Relating to the securitization of public utility expenditures other than expenditures for generation asset retirement; and declaring an emergency.

OR HB3630

Relating to energy; and declaring an emergency.

Similar Bills

RI H6048

Public Utilities Commission

RI H7428

Replaces time to time language with staggered for acquisitions, commission would review the acquisition plan, and requires an annual review. Repeals ยงยง 39-1-27.3.1 and 39-1-27.8 dealing with standard offer service.

RI S0476

Public Utilities Commission

MA S2239

Prohibiting the use of ratepayer funds for utility lobbying, promotions or perks

MA H3400

Prohibiting the use of ratepayer funds for utility lobbying, promotions, or perks

RI H6047

Public Utilities Commission

RI S0469

Public Utilities Commission

OR SB926

Relating to wildfires resulting from the fault of an electric company; declaring an emergency.