Oregon House Bill HB3336

Oregon 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/25
• Refer: 1/24/25
• Report Pass: 4/4/25
• Engrossed: 4/14/25
• Refer: 4/14/25

Caption

Relating to electric transmission systems; prescribing an effective date.

Impact

The bill's intended impact revolves around improving the efficiency and resiliency of Oregon's electric transmission system. By mandating the use of grid-enhancing technologies, the bill aims to increase transmission capacity, reduce congestion, and lessen the curtailment of renewable energy resources. Moreover, it emphasizes the importance of adhering to clean energy targets and suggests that these measures can also help mitigate wildfire risks arising from the transmission infrastructure.

Summary

House Bill 3336 focuses on enhancing Oregon's electric transmission system by requiring electric companies to develop strategic plans for using grid-enhancing technologies. The bill mandates these companies to file their strategic plans with the Public Utility Commission (PUC) and to update these plans every two years. Furthermore, the legislation establishes a timeline for the implementation of the strategies outlined in the plans, with an effective carry-out date set for January 1, 2030. The adoption of such technologies is seen as essential for meeting clean energy targets and ensuring system reliability amidst growing energy demands.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB 3336 appears to be favorable among energy advocates and environmental groups who support efforts to boost clean energy capabilities. The emphasis on modernizing infrastructure to accommodate renewable energy has drawn praise, suggesting that the bill addresses both environmental concerns and the need for reliable energy access. However, there may also be some apprehension about the costs associated with implementing the required technologies and whether these investments will be passed on to consumers in the form of higher utility rates.

Contention

While the bill has gained traction, discussions may arise concerning the feasibility and financial implications of executing the extensive planning and analyses required. Critics may voice concerns regarding the adequacy of cost-effectiveness assessments that electric companies must conduct, particularly as the initial funding for these grid-enhancing technologies could represent a significant investment. Balancing state mandates for cleaner energy production while ensuring affordability for households will likely remain a point of contention as the bill moves forward.