Oregon 2025 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB3626

Introduced
2/18/25  

Caption

Relating to vehicles.

Impact

The proposed bill would centralize micromobility regulations within the state's transportation framework, influencing existing laws around vehicle definitions and safety protocols. For instance, it stipulates that children aged 12 and older can operate certain e-scooters and e-bikes under specified conditions. The Oregon Department of Transportation is tasked with launching a public information campaign to inform citizens about these legal changes, thus demonstrating a commitment to widespread awareness and compliance.

Summary

House Bill 3626 aims to regulate powered micromobility devices and establish safety requirements for their use, particularly focusing on children under the age of 16. The bill defines what constitutes a 'powered micromobility device,' which includes vehicles designed to transport a person and powered by a propulsion system, with a maximum speed cap. Notably, it mandates that all minors under 16 must wear helmets when using bicycles, e-bikes, e-scooters, and similar conveyances. This approach is intended to enhance public safety and promote responsible usage among younger operators of these devices.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 3626 reflects a proactive stance towards enhancing safety and public awareness regarding emerging transportation technologies. Supporters, including various child safety advocates, express optimism that the regulations will reduce accidents and injuries among minors using powered devices. However, some skeptics question the practicality of enforcing helmet laws among youths and the potential impact on personal freedom associated with micromobility options.

Contention

Notable points of contention center around the balance between regulatory oversight and personal liberties. Some lawmakers and community members argue that mandatory helmet laws may infringe on personal choice, particularly for older youths who may prefer more autonomy in their transportation choices. Critics suggest that extensive regulations could deter youngsters from engaging with these innovative forms of transport that are supposed to promote eco-friendliness and mobility within urban areas.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

IL SB2247

MICROMOBILITY FIRE SAFETY

US SB389

Setting Consumer Standards for Lithium-Ion Batteries Act

US HB973

Setting Consumer Standards for Lithium-Ion Batteries Act

FL H0567

Transportation

WA SB5161

Revised for 1st Substitute: Addressing transportation fiscal matters.

MN SF291

Vehicle miles traveled project assessment criteria requirements amendment provision and electric vehicle and zero-emission bus technology as mitigation activities authorization

MA S1925

Imposing an in-state mileage-based road usage charge on the use of clean energy vehicles

MD SB397

Motorcycles - Protective Headgear Requirement - Exception (In Remembrance of Gary "Pappy" Boward)