Relating to collection of system development charges.
Impact
The bill will significantly impact local government policies regarding the timing and collection of system development charges, which are fees imposed to cover the costs associated with new developments, such as infrastructure improvements. By enforcing that these fees cannot be collected prior to occupancy, HB3639 seeks to provide flexibility for homebuyers, potentially making housing more affordable and accessible by reducing upfront costs. This amendment to existing regulations is expected to facilitate a speedier approval process for housing projects, contributing to the overall goal of increasing housing supply within urban boundaries.
Summary
House Bill 3639 aims to amend the regulations surrounding the collection of system development charges (SDCs) for new urban homes. Under this bill, local governments are prohibited from requiring the payment of SDCs before issuing a certificate of occupancy for new dwelling units located within an urban growth boundary. This change is intended to alleviate financial burdens on homebuyers and encourage the development of new housing by postponing the payment of these charges until after the home is built and occupancy is granted. The measure is anticipated to foster residential development in urban areas, especially amidst ongoing housing shortages.
Sentiment
The sentiment around HB3639 appears supportive among proponents of housing development and affordability, as it addresses concerns regarding financial barriers that homebuyers face. Advocates argue that this bill is a necessary step toward increasing the pace of housing construction in urban areas, given the pressing need for more residential units. However, there may also be concerns from local governments regarding revenue loss from SDCs, which could impact their ability to fund essential services and infrastructure projects that support new developments.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding HB3639 may stem from the potential financial implications for local governments that rely on system development charges as a revenue source for infrastructure funding. There may be apprehension about the ability of municipalities to maintain necessary services and development-related improvements without these fees being collected upfront. The debate may ultimately center on the balance between stimulating new home construction and ensuring that local governments remain financially viable to support such developments within their jurisdictions.