Oregon 2025 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB3678

Introduced
2/25/25  

Caption

Relating to all-terrain vehicles; prescribing an effective date.

Impact

The potential impact of House Bill 3678 on state laws is significant as it amends existing statutes regarding all-terrain vehicle operations. Under the proposed bill, counties will have the authority to designate highway access routes for ATVs, which could lead to increased ATV access in rural areas and enhance recreational opportunities for users. Additionally, the establishment of the All-Terrain Vehicle Highway Access Routes Advisory Committee is aimed at ensuring that local considerations are taken into account during the route designation process. This balance between regulation and accessibility is vital for both ATV users and county road management.

Summary

House Bill 3678 relates to the operation of all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) on county roads in Oregon. Specifically, the bill proposes to allow ATVs to drive on county roads provided that the respective county has granted approval. This expands the existing legislation that already permits ATVs to operate on state highways, therefore facilitating broader access for ATV users across the state. The bill outlines that the changes will take effect on the 91st day following the adjournment of the legislative session, providing a clear timeline for implementation.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 3678 appears to be generally supportive among ATV enthusiasts and recreation advocates who advocate for expanded access and increased recreational opportunities. However, concerns may arise from local officials and residents regarding safety and the environmental impact of increased ATV traffic on county roads. The discussion leading into the bill's passage may reflect a tension between promoting recreational access and maintaining road safety and local environmental standards.

Contention

Some notable points of contention may include discussions on the safety implications of allowing ATVs on county roads, particularly regarding their interaction with traditional vehicles. Stakeholders may also deliberate over the authority given to county governing bodies versus the state regulations established by the Oregon Transportation Commission. Advocates for safety may argue that without adequate regulations, the increased presence of ATVs could pose risks to both riders and other road users, warranting adequate planning and safety measures.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

OK HB1795

Driver licenses; notification for cancellation or denial of driving privileges of certain persons; revocation; petition; effective date.

ME LD2137

An Act to Join the Dentist and Dental Hygienist Compact

AL SB25

Relating to the Board of Physical Therapy; to amend Sections 34-24-191, 34-24-193, 34-24-194, 34-24-196, 34-24-210, 34-24-210.1, 34-24-211, 34-24-212, 34-24-213, 34-24-214, and 34-24-217, Code of Alabama 1975; to give the board authority over certain physical therapy professionals licensed in other states.

AL HB110

Relating to the Board of Physical Therapy; to amend Sections 34-24-191, 34-24-193, 34-24-194, 34-24-196, 34-24-210, 34-24-210.1, 34-24-211, 34-24-212, 34-24-213, 34-24-214, and 34-24-217, Code of Alabama 1975; to give the board authority over certain physical therapy professionals licensed in other states.

LA HCSR10

Requests the House Committee on Civil Law and Procedure and the Senate Committee on Judiciary A to study notice of liens under the Private Works Act

IN HB1554

Driving with suspended driving privileges.

VA SB1185

Campaign finance; coordination and required independent expenditure committee disclosure.

CA AB271

Homeless death review committees.