Oregon 2025 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB3727

Introduced
2/25/25  
Refer
2/27/25  
Report Pass
4/7/25  
Engrossed
4/15/25  
Refer
4/15/25  
Report Pass
5/28/25  
Enrolled
6/11/25  
Passed
6/20/25  
Chaptered
7/7/25  

Caption

Relating to telemedicine.

Impact

The enactment of HB3727 would have significant implications on state laws pertaining to healthcare delivery. By formalizing the regulations surrounding telemedicine, the bill is designed to create a framework that supports both providers and patients. This could streamline the process for healthcare professionals to offer services remotely and may reduce administrative burdens associated with telehealth operations. With this legislative change, the state aims to improve healthcare accessibility, particularly in rural or underserved areas where traditional medical facilities may be lacking.

Summary

House Bill 3727 aims to enhance the accessibility and regulation of telemedicine services across the state. By providing clearer guidelines for the provision of telehealth services, the bill seeks to enable healthcare providers to offer remote services more effectively, thereby improving patients' access to necessary medical care. The bill appears to be a response to the increasing demand for telemedicine amid evolving healthcare needs and the push for innovative solutions in delivering medical services remotely.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB3727 has been positive, particularly among healthcare providers and advocates for expanded access to medical services. Proponents argue that this bill not only addresses current healthcare challenges but also prepares the state for future medical delivery trends. However, there are some concerns regarding the quality of care provided via telemedicine and whether changes in regulation might compromise patient safety and effective communication between providers and patients.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB3727 include discussions about the adequacy of the proposed regulatory frameworks and their implications for patient care. Opponents may express worries that hastily implemented telehealth services could lack necessary quality controls, potentially impacting patient outcomes. These discussions highlight the delicate balance between expanding access to healthcare services and ensuring that such services meet established standards of care and patient safety.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

OR SB232

Relating to the practice of medicine via remote means; and prescribing an effective date.

OR HB4010

Relating to health care; prescribing an effective date.

OR HB2584

Relating to physician assistants; and prescribing an effective date.

OR HB2583

Relating to physician assistants.

OR SB927

Relating to practice of medicine by physician assistants; prescribing an effective date.

OR HB3412

Relating to medical practitioners in workers' compensation claims.

OR SB891

Relating to death with dignity.

OR HB2002

Relating to health; and declaring an emergency.

OR HB4130

Relating to the practice of health care; prescribing an effective date.

OR SB1046

Relating to provider networks.

Similar Bills

LA HB702

Provides with respect to the practice of physician assistants

HI SB61

Relating To Associate Physicians.

HI SB61

Relating To Associate Physicians.

CO SB083

Physician Assistant Collaboration Requirements

TN SB2136

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 55; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to healthcare providers.

TN HB2318

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 55; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to healthcare providers.

TN HB1311

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 49; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to graduate physicians.

TN SB0937

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 49; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to graduate physicians.