Oregon 2025 Regular Session

Oregon Senate Bill SB539

Introduced
1/13/25  

Caption

Relating to fees charged for services provided in hospital-based facilities.

Impact

If enacted, SB539 will amend existing laws in relation to healthcare billing and impose significant changes to the way hospitals manage and communicate facility fees. Under this bill, hospitals must provide clear notices to patients about these added costs before services are rendered. Furthermore, any attempt to collect fees outside the newly defined parameters would be classified as an unlawful collection practice, resulting in potential penalties administered by the Oregon Health Authority. This indicates a shift towards greater transparency and accountability within healthcare billing practices in Oregon.

Summary

Senate Bill 539 aims to regulate the practice of charging facility fees in Oregon hospitals and health systems. This legislation tasks the Oregon Health Authority with overseeing and regulating the collection of such fees, mandating hospitals to report on their facility fees and to notify patients regarding potential charges. It specifically permits hospitals to charge these fees only for services rendered on-campus or in facilities equipped with emergency departments, thereby restricting certain common practices perceived as unjustified fee collection.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB539 appears to be generally supportive among consumer advocacy groups and some legislators who argue it will protect patients from unexpected and excessive charges. However, there are concerns expressed by some hospital administrators about the implications for hospital revenues and operational flexibility. The division reflects ongoing tension between efforts to improve patient care and the financial realities of healthcare operations.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions about SB539 include the balance between ensuring fair fees and the financial sustainability of hospitals. Critics worry that limiting the ability to charge facility fees could adversely impact the funding hospitals rely on to maintain their services. Conversely, proponents argue that these regulations are essential to safeguard patient rights and prevent exploitative billing practices, especially given the complexity of healthcare costs that often leave patients confused about their financial obligations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MD HB268

Hospitals - Financial Assistance and Collection of Debts - Policies

MD SB981

Hospitals - Financial Assistance and Collection of Debts - Policies

MD HB1324

Hospitals - Medical Debt Collection - Sale of Patient Debt to Nonprofit Organizations

MD HB405

Prince George's County - Hospitals - Sale of Patient Debt PG 402-25

MD HB765

Hospitals - Medical Debt Collection - Sale of Patient Debt

MD HB1020

Consumer Protection - Credit Reporting - Medical Debt (Fair Medical Debt Reporting Act)

MD SB614

Consumer Protection - Credit Reporting - Medical Debt (Fair Medical Debt Reporting Act)

OR SB605

Relating to medical debt reporting.