Oregon 2025 Regular Session

Oregon Senate Bill SB795

Introduced
1/13/25  
Refer
1/17/25  
Report Pass
3/3/25  
Engrossed
3/10/25  
Refer
3/13/25  
Report Pass
5/1/25  
Enrolled
5/5/25  
Passed
5/14/25  
Chaptered
5/20/25  

Caption

Relating to marine cleanup; and prescribing an effective date.

Impact

If enacted, SB795 will significantly impact state laws governing marine resources, especially concerning the salvage and disposal of vessels considered abandoned or derelict. The legislation empowers authorized agencies to act promptly to remove harmful vessels, thus proactively addressing environmental concerns. The bill also includes provisions for a Salvaged Vessel Subaccount, allowing for the funding of these recovery efforts, thus enhancing the overall effectiveness of marine cleanup operations in the state.

Summary

Senate Bill 795 (SB795) focuses on addressing the issues related to abandoned and derelict vessels in Oregon. The bill revises existing statutes to enhance the state's ability to manage these vessels more effectively, primarily through amendments to the definitions captured in Oregon Revised Statutes. It aims to streamline enforcement actions against derelict vessels while imposing liabilities on vessel owners for associated costs of recovery, towing, and disposal. By clarifying the legal framework surrounding abandoned vessels, the bill intends to mitigate environmental hazards and improve safety on Oregon waters.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB795 is broadly supportive, reflecting a consensus on the necessity of addressing environmental hazards posed by abandoned vessels. Stakeholders, including environmental advocacy groups and local government entities, have expressed approval of the bill, viewing it as a vital step toward improving Oregon's waterway safety and health. However, concerns have been raised regarding potential financial liabilities for vessel owners, which some argue could disproportionately affect less affluent individuals or small-time boat owners.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB795 relate to the responsibilities placed on vessel owners for disposal and salvage costs, which some critics argue could lead to financial burdens on individuals who may have lack of resources to reclaim their vessels. Additionally, the delineation of authority between different enforcement agencies in handling abandoned vessels may lead to disputes regarding jurisdiction and responsibilities. Nevertheless, these challenges are outweighed by the anticipated benefits of effective marine management.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MS SB2076

Derelict vessels; provide certain requirements for the removal of.

MS HB1076

Derelict vessels; provide certain requirements for the removal of.

CA AB748

California Abandoned and Derelict Commercial Vessel Program.

CA AB274

Abandoned and derelict vessels: inventory.

NC S505

Address Abandoned and Derelict Vessels

NC H887

Address Abandoned and Derelict Vessels

RI S0260

Amends the definition of a "houseboat" to include motorized or non-motorized vessels.

RI H5190

Amends the definition of a "houseboat" to include motorized or non-motorized vessels.