Pennsylvania House Bill HB1298

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/2/23
• Refer: 6/2/23

Caption

In firearms and other dangerous articles, further providing for licenses and for sale or transfer of firearms; and, in public safety, establishing the Shot Tracking Technology Grant Program and the Shot Tracking Technology Grant Program Fund and imposing duties on the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency.

Impact

The introduction of HB1298 is expected to have a significant impact on state laws regarding firearm regulation and public safety. By facilitating the establishment of the Shot Tracking Technology Grant Program, the bill intends to provide funding and resources for implementing advanced technology in law enforcement departments. This could lead to better crime prevention strategies and potentially reduce gun-related crimes by enhancing the capability of authorities to investigate and resolve cases involving firearms.

Summary

House Bill 1298 aims to introduce measures concerning firearm licenses and the sale or transfer of firearms. Specifically, the bill includes provisions for establishing a Shot Tracking Technology Grant Program, which seeks to support the implementation of technology that can assist in tracing firearms used in crimes. The initiative emphasizes the importance of public safety and aims to enhance law enforcement capabilities through improved tracking of firearms involved in criminal activities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB1298 appears to be cautiously optimistic among supporters who believe that the use of technology can positively influence public safety and crime reduction efforts. However, there is also concern regarding the implications of increased regulation and the balance between safety measures and the rights of responsible gun owners. The discourse reflects a broader debate on how best to address gun violence while respecting individual rights and freedoms.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to HB1298 include the effectiveness of tracking technology and its potential implications for privacy and civil liberties. Critics may argue that increased regulation or oversight could infringe on the rights of law-abiding citizens. Additionally, discussions about funding sources for the proposed grant program and the allocation of resources among various law enforcement agencies could spark debate. As lawmakers consider these changes, the balance between enhancing safety measures and maintaining individual rights remains a focal point of the debate.