In real property, providing for Pennsylvania attainable housing community designation.
The bill mandates that municipalities must allow for accessory dwelling units and provide a mix of housing options that cater to workforce needs, termed as the 'missing middle' housing. This includes not only traditional single-family homes but also duplexes, townhouses, and mixed-use developments. The Department of Community and Economic Development is tasked with overseeing the applications from municipalities, establishing an online registry for those designated as attainable housing communities, and ensuring that new local zoning ordinances align with the state’s housing goals.
House Bill 1386 introduces a significant amendment to Title 68 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, focusing on establishing a 'Pennsylvania attainable housing community designation.' This bill outlines specific criteria for municipalities to qualify as attainable housing communities, thereby enabling them to access state resources and support for housing initiatives aimed at addressing affordability issues. By focusing on middle-income housing, which is defined as affordable for households earning between 60% and 120% of the Area Median Income (AMI), the bill aims to increase the availability of housing options within the state.
The general sentiment around HB 1386 appears to be positive among supporters who view it as a proactive measure to combat the housing crisis in the state. Advocates argue it will provide necessary flexibility for municipalities to better address local housing needs and promote economic growth. However, concerns have been raised regarding the feasibility of meeting the bill's requirements and the potential impact on existing zoning laws and community character.
Notable points of contention surrounding the bill include discussions about the adequacy of the defined qualifications for attaining the designation and the potential financial implications for municipalities in implementing the required zoning changes. Critics fear that without adequate resources and support, the designation could create additional burdens rather than facilitate meaningful improvements in housing availability. The bill also raises questions about the ongoing challenge of balancing local autonomy with state mandates in the realm of housing development.