In general provisions relating to general procurement provisions, providing for preference for bid or proposal.
Impact
The enactment of HB 2015 is expected to have a significant effect on state procurement processes, reinforcing a preference for American-made products in government contracts. By mandating that procurement entities award contracts based on revised bids that favor manufacturers producing in the United States, the law positions Pennsylvania to potentially bolster local businesses and promote job creation within the state. The requirement for documentation from bidders ensures accountability and transparency in compliance with the new provision.
Summary
House Bill 2015 introduces amendments to Title 62 (Procurement) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, establishing a new provision for bid or proposal preferences based on American-made supplies, services, or construction. Specifically, the bill stipulates that for competitive sealed bidding or proposals, a government agency or school entity must subtract 2% from the bid or proposal of entities that provide American-made products. This initiative encourages the procurement of domestically produced goods, benefitting local economies and supporting national manufacturing sectors.
Sentiment
General sentiment towards HB 2015 appears to be supportive among lawmakers advocating for local job creation and economic development. Proponents view the bill as a crucial step towards fostering a more resilient local economy and ensuring that state funds are directed towards American manufacturers. However, there may be concerns about the implications this could have on cost and competition, particularly if the pricing of American-made goods is not competitive compared to international alternatives.
Contention
Notable points of contention may arise regarding the definition of 'American-made' and the potential impact on entities unable to meet the requirements for the 2% preference. Critics might argue that the restrictions could limit opportunities for qualified bidders who are not able to demonstrate compliance. Additionally, there are considerations about how the bill will ultimately affect the competitiveness of the procurement process, as entities that rely on international products or services may be placed at a disadvantage.