In support matters generally, providing for support of unborn child.
Impact
If enacted, HB 2190 would amend Title 23 (Domestic Relations) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes to include specific provisions on child support for unborn children. It allows courts to enforce and order support based on the biological father's financial capacity and the support requested by the biological mother. This law could lead to significant changes in how child support is approached in Pennsylvania, potentially reducing the financial burden on mothers and ensuring that unborn children have access to necessary resources during pregnancy.
Summary
House Bill 2190, introduced in the Pennsylvania General Assembly, aims to establish a legal framework for support obligations concerning unborn children. This legislation allows a biological mother to initiate support actions against the biological father for the financial support of an unborn child, with obligations commencing at the first prenatal medical visit. The bill seeks to provide clarity on the rights and responsibilities of biological parents before the child’s birth, addressing financial support issues early in the gestation period.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding this bill appears to be supportive among advocates for unborn children's rights and financial support equity. Proponents argue that the legislation promotes fairness in parental responsibilities by recognizing the rights of the unborn child to financial support. However, there may be contention among those concerned about its implications for paternal rights and the potential for disputes during pregnancy, leading to a polarized debate on the topic.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the conditions under which paternity can be established and the potential retroactive nature of support payments. Critics may argue that the provision allowing for the collection of retroactive payments could lead to legal challenges and strain family relationships before the child is even born. Additionally, the stipulation that a paternity action requires the biological mother’s consent may raise questions regarding fairness and the rights of the father in such scenarios.