Further providing for proposed regulations and procedures for review.
Impact
If passed, HB 2365 would significantly impact state law by requiring additional documentation and justification for proposed regulations. It would enhance the role of the Independent Regulatory Review Commission in scrutinizing proposed regulations, particularly those based on foreign guidance. This change is anticipated to create more burdensome requirements for state agencies, which may lead to delays in regulatory processes but is also seen as a way to ensure that regulation is grounded in relevant and reliable data.
Summary
House Bill 2365 seeks to amend the Regulatory Review Act in Pennsylvania by introducing more stringent measures for the review of proposed regulations. Specifically, it mandates that any agency proposing new regulations must include a regulatory analysis form that details the application of any guidance received from international organizations such as the World Health Organization, the United Nations, or the World Economic Forum. This effort aims to enhance transparency and accountability in the regulatory process by requiring agencies to substantiate the relevance of international guidance to Pennsylvania's context.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 2365 appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that it is a positive step towards greater accountability and tailored regulations that reflect the unique needs of Pennsylvania. They believe that having to justify international guidelines will prevent misapplication and ensure that regulations are beneficial to the state. Conversely, critics are concerned that this could lead to regulatory paralysis, as agencies may be bogged down by the additional paperwork and scrutiny. They argue that reliance on international guidance presents risks of external influence over state regulations.
Contention
Key points of contention regarding HB 2365 include the implications of requiring state agencies to validate the relevance of international regulatory guidance. Critics worry that this requirement could hinder timely regulatory responses and lead to unnecessary complications in the regulatory landscape. Additionally, there are concerns about the perception of state sovereignty and autonomy in regulatory decisions, as some view the act as an unwarranted curtailment of state agency authority. The balance between ensuring responsible regulation and maintaining efficient governmental processes is at the forefront of this debate.
Further providing for definitions, for proposed regulations and procedures for review and for final-form regulations and final-omitted regulations and procedures for review; and providing for concurrent resolution required for economically significant regulations.
Further providing for definitions, for proposed regulations and procedures for review and for final-form regulations and final-omitted regulations and procedures for review; providing for regulations deemed withdrawn; further providing for procedures for subsequent review of disapproved final-form or final-omitted regulations by the commission; and providing for concurrent resolution required for economically significant regulations.
Further providing for definitions, for proposed regulations and procedures for review and for final-form regulations and final-omitted regulations and procedures for review; providing for regulations deemed withdrawn; further providing for procedures for subsequent review of disapproved final-form or final-omitted regulations; and providing for concurrent resolution required for economically significant regulations.
Further providing for definitions, for proposed regulations and procedures for review and for final-form regulations and final-omitted regulations and procedures for review; providing for regulations deemed withdrawn; further providing for procedures for subsequent review of disapproved final-form or final-omitted regulations; and providing for concurrent resolution required for economically significant regulations.
Further providing for definitions, for proposed regulations and procedures for review and for final-form regulations and final-omitted regulations and procedures for review; providing for regulations deemed withdrawn; further providing for procedures for subsequent review of disapproved final-form or final-omitted regulations; and providing for concurrent resolution required for economically significant regulations.
Further providing for definitions, for proposed regulations and procedures for review and for final-form regulations and final-omitted regulations and procedures for review; providing for regulations deemed withdrawn; further providing for procedures for subsequent review of disapproved final-form or final-omitted regulations; providing for concurrent resolution required for economically significant regulations; further providing for existing regulations; and providing for State agency regulatory compliance officers and for Independent Office of the Repealer.
Further providing for definitions, for proposed regulations and procedures for review and for final-form regulations and final-omitted regulations and procedures for review; providing for regulations deemed withdrawn; further providing for procedures for subsequent review of disapproved final-form or final-omitted regulations; providing for concurrent resolution required for economically significant regulations; further providing for existing regulations; and providing for State agency regulatory compliance officers and for Office of Government Efficiency.