Pennsylvania House Bill HB2443

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/24/24
• Refer: 6/24/24

Caption

Establishing the Right to Counsel Program and the Tenant Right to Counsel Task Force; and imposing duties on the Department of Human Services.

Impact

The legislation would significantly drive changes in how housing-related legal services are delivered in Pennsylvania. It allows for the establishment of grants specifically for designated organizations that provide direct legal representation for eligible tenants. By doing so, it aims to improve housing stability in communities and ensure that the legal rights of renters are protected, which is especially pertinent in eviction cases. The bill mandates that administrative costs related to fund management remain capped at 10%, thus ensuring more resources are directly allocated for tenant assistance.

Summary

House Bill 2443, known as the Right to Counsel Program Act, aims to establish a legal framework that grants individuals facing eviction access to legal representation. By creating a Right to Counsel Program and a Tenant Right to Counsel Task Force, the bill seeks to ensure that low-income tenants, defined as those with an annual gross income not exceeding 200% of the Federal poverty guidelines, receive necessary legal aid in housing-related matters. This program is intended to be funded through state appropriations, federal funds, and other designated revenues, enhancing legal support for vulnerable populations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2443 appears generally supportive among advocacy groups and lawmakers who recognize the importance of legal support for low-income individuals facing eviction. Proponents argue that this legislation is a critical step in addressing housing insecurity and protecting vulnerable populations from unjust evictions. However, there may be concerns regarding the bill's funding sustainability and whether it can effectively manage the expected demand for legal services, indicating a cautious but positive outlook from stakeholders.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the bill's implementation and funding mechanisms. Critics may raise concerns about the potential burden on the state's budget and the effectiveness of the program in meeting the legal needs of all eligible tenants. Additionally, discussions could revolve around the governance of the task force that oversees the program, specifically how representative and effective it will be in truly addressing tenant rights across diverse communities. Questions about the selection and capacity of designated organizations to render services could also be points of debate.