Further providing for procedures for submitting, challenging and protecting confidential security information.
Impact
The impact of HB2509 on state laws is significant as it redefines the conditions under which confidential security information can be disclosed. By allowing for exceptions in cases of safety concerns, the bill increases the accountability of public utilities, ensuring that safety risks can be addressed swiftly. This change is expected to enhance public safety and regulatory oversight while balancing the protection of sensitive information related to utility operations.
Summary
House Bill 2509 aims to amend the Public Utility Confidential Security Information Disclosure Protection Act to enhance the procedures regarding the submission, challenge, and protection of confidential security information related to public utilities in Pennsylvania. The proposed amendments include provisions that allow public utilities to make available records and emergency response plans to federal or state agencies if there are reasonable grounds to believe that a utility facility poses a safety risk. This aims to ensure more robust oversight and responsiveness in cases where public safety may be at stake.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB2509 appears to be supportive from those prioritizing public safety and regulatory transparency. Proponents argue that the bill will facilitate timely access to critical information in emergencies, ultimately protecting the public from potential hazards. However, there are concerns from some stakeholders about the implications for the confidentiality of sensitive information and how broadly the term 'reasonable grounds' for disclosure may be interpreted.
Contention
Among the notable points of contention is the balance between protecting utility companies’ confidential information and ensuring public safety. Critics worry that broadening the scope for disclosures may lead to overreach or misuse of information. Additionally, discussions have focused on defining clear protocols for what constitutes a safety risk and ensuring that the implementation does not inadvertently compromise the security measures that protect utility infrastructure. The effective execution and interpretation of these changes will be crucial as they move forward.
In preliminary provisions, further providing for definitions; in administration, further providing for confidentiality of records; and providing for abuse and neglect registry.
Further providing for definitions, for notification of the breach of the security of the system, for exceptions and for notice exemption; repealing provisions relating to civil relief; providing for protection of personal information, for civil relief, for information security and for applicability; and repealing provisions relating to applicability.
Further providing for definitions, for security freeze and for fees; and providing for credit monitoring services, for prohibiting the waiver of rights and for protected persons security freeze.