In preliminary provisions, providing for effect of declaration of disaster emergency; and imposing a penalty.
Impact
The impact of HB372 will be significant as it alters the dynamics between landlords and tenants in times of disaster emergencies. By preventing evictions and unauthorized entries during these periods, the bill seeks to enhance tenant stability and security. It reflects a growing acknowledgment of the need for tenant protections in situations that can lead to economic hardship, thereby potentially reducing homelessness and maintaining community stability during crises.
Summary
House Bill 372, introduced in Pennsylvania, amends the existing Landlord and Tenant Act to provide specific protections for tenants during a declared disaster emergency. The bill makes it unlawful for landlords to evict tenants who are unable to find employment due to the disaster, and it prohibits landlords from entering leased premises for showing purposes without tenant consent during such emergencies. This legislation aims to safeguard vulnerable populations from eviction when their ability to pay rent is compromised due to unforeseen circumstances.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB372 appears to be supportive, especially from tenant advocacy groups and those concerned with housing stability during emergencies. Proponents argue that this bill is a necessary step in protecting the most vulnerable members of society during difficult times. However, there may be concerns from landlords about the implications of restricting their ability to manage rental properties, which could lead to dissent among property owners who feel their rights are being limited.
Contention
Notable points of contention around HB372 include the balance of rights between landlords and tenants. While many support the idea of protecting tenants during emergencies, some stakeholders, particularly from the landlord community, may argue that the bill creates unfair penalties and reduces landlords' autonomy over their properties. The appropriateness of penalties—set at a minimum of $500 per occurrence for violations—also raises questions about the enforcement of tenant rights versus the regulatory burdens placed on landlords.
In preliminary provisions, further providing for definitions; and, in creation of leases, statute of frauds and mortgaging of leaseholds, providing for website and disclosure of flood risks.
In preliminary provisions, providing for student data privacy and protection; imposing duties on the Department of Education; and providing for penalties.
In preliminary provisions, further providing for definitions and providing for disaster emergency declaration and for testing requirement, duty to report and public access; in powers and duties, further providing for powers and duties of department; and, in liability and settlement procedures, further providing for responsible person.