Pennsylvania House Bill HB428

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/15/23
• Refer: 3/15/23

Caption

In assault, further providing for the offense of aggravated assault and for probable cause arrests in domestic violence cases; repealing provisions relating to abortion; in incapacitated persons, further providing for provisions concerning powers, duties and liabilities; providing for reproductive rights; imposing duties on the Department of Health; and imposing penalties.

Impact

The bill's provisions are expected to reshape the legal landscape of domestic violence and reproductive health in Pennsylvania. By focusing on aggravated assault in domestic scenarios, the bill reinforces the state's commitment to addressing and mitigating domestic violence. At the same time, the amendments regarding abortion indicate a move towards more regulated healthcare practices, potentially limiting access to abortion services and influencing healthcare funding. The legislation seeks to create a balance between protecting individuals involved in domestic violence cases and enforcing regulations on reproductive rights.

Summary

House Bill 428 introduces significant amendments to Pennsylvania's laws regarding aggravated assault and reproductive rights. It expands the definition of aggravated assault in instances of domestic violence and provides stricter guidelines concerning the authorization and performance of abortions. The bill aims to enhance protections against domestic violence while simultaneously implementing stringent measures for reproductive health, including preemptive restrictions on abortion services funded by public money.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 428 appears to be deeply divided. Proponents advocate for the robust measures against domestic violence, suggesting that these amendments reflect a necessary response to an ongoing crisis. Conversely, opponents express concern that the restrictions on abortion could infringe upon women's rights and access to healthcare, sparking fears of a rollback in reproductive freedoms. This contentious dichotomy underscores the broader legislative battles occurring around reproductive rights and gender-based violence in contemporary society.

Contention

Key points of contention in the discussions around HB 428 include the implications of limiting state funding for abortions and how such restrictions intersect with issues of personal autonomy and healthcare access. Critics argue that these measures may disproportionately affect low-income individuals and minors seeking reproductive health services, raising ethical questions about consent and access to necessary medical procedures. Additionally, there are concerns regarding the effectiveness of the aggravated assault provisions in genuinely protecting victims of domestic violence without exacerbating existing disparities.