Pennsylvania House Bill HB717

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/27/23
• Refer: 3/27/23

Caption

A Joint Resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, further providing for exemptions and special provisions.

Impact

If enacted, HB 717 would impact the existing tax laws in Pennsylvania by codifying specific exemptions for veterans, which could lead to a reduction in property tax revenue for local governments. The bill intends to alleviate the financial burden faced by severely disabled veterans and their spouses, thereby acknowledging their sacrifices and service to the nation. It allows for the potential of property tax refunds to those who have already paid taxes in the year the exemption is awarded, adding a layer of financial support for qualifying residents.

Summary

House Bill 717 proposes an amendment to the Constitution of Pennsylvania that aims to provide property tax exemptions for certain veterans and their surviving spouses. Specifically, the bill seeks to exempt individuals who are honorably discharged from military service and who have significant disabilities, such as being blind or having lost limbs, from real property taxes. Additionally, the bill extends this exemption to the unmarried surviving spouses of military members who were killed in action or died due to injuries sustained in service, allowing them to receive similar tax relief under defined conditions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 717 appears to be largely positive, particularly among veteran advocacy groups and legislators who support increased benefits for military personnel and their families. Feelings of gratitude and support for veterans' sacrifices are common sentiment themes. However, there may also be concerns about the implications of tax exemptions on local funding and services, leading some lawmakers to express caution regarding the broad application of such exemptions.

Contention

Some points of contention surrounding the bill include discussions about the financial implications of providing tax exemptions to a specific group, potentially at the cost of reduced funding for local services. While proponents argue this is a necessary recognition of service, critics may raise concerns about equity and whether the state can afford to offer such substantial tax relief. The definition of who qualifies for the exemptions, particularly regarding disabilities and the status of surviving spouses, could also spark debate among legislators and advocacy groups.