Providing for historic homeownership preservation incentive tax credit; imposing duties on the Department of Community and Economic Development and the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission; and establishing the Historic Homeowner Preservation Tax Credit Administration Fund.
The introduction of HB724 is expected to have a positive impact on state laws related to historic preservation and community development. By incentivizing the rehabilitation of historic homes, the bill seeks to stimulate economic activity, enhance property values, and contribute to maintaining the cultural heritage of communities. Homeowners will benefit from tax credits for expenses incurred during renovations, which helps alleviate the financial burden associated with restoring historic properties.
House Bill 724, introduced in 2023, aims to establish a Historic Homeownership Preservation Incentive Tax Credit to incentivize the preservation of historic homes in Pennsylvania. This bill amends the Tax Reform Code of 1971 by creating a new article dedicated to providing tax credits for homeowners who rehabilitate certified historic properties. The tax credit will be available to qualified taxpayers who complete approved rehabilitation projects on homes identified as historical properties under specific criteria set forth by the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission.
The general sentiment surrounding HB724 seems to be supportive, particularly among advocates for historic preservation and community development. Proponents argue that the bill will not only help preserve Pennsylvania's architectural heritage but also promote economic growth with increased property taxes in revitalized neighborhoods. However, there may be concerns about the allocation of funds and the effective management of the tax credit program.
While there is overall support for the bill, some contention may arise regarding the administration of the tax credit program, including how credits are allocated and the criteria for qualifying projects. Additionally, critics may question whether the fiscal impact on state revenue is justified by the intended benefits of historic preservation, leading to discussions about potential amendments to mitigate financial burdens on the state.