Pennsylvania House Bill HB740

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/28/23
• Refer: 3/28/23

Caption

Providing for an impact fee for natural gas and oil pipelines; establishing the Pipeline Impact Fund; and imposing powers and duties on the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

Impact

If enacted, HB740 is expected to generate revenue that could support local governments where oil and gas pipelines are located. The funds collected from the impact fees will be distributed to counties and municipalities in affected areas, potentially providing financial relief that can be used for emergency services, infrastructure repairs, and other local needs. However, the bill may also face scrutiny regarding the adequacy of fees imposed and the overall effectiveness of the fund in addressing local impacts.

Summary

House Bill 740 aims to amend Title 58 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes to establish an impact fee for natural gas and oil pipelines. This bill seeks to create the Pipeline Impact Fund, which will be financed by fees collected from operators of impact pipelines. The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission will be tasked with the regulation and administration of this fee system, ensuring that the funds are properly managed and allocated. This new framework is designed to provide financial resources to local governments affected by the presence of these pipelines.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB740 is generally supportive among those advocating for greater accountability and funding for areas impacted by energy infrastructure. Proponents argue that the implementation of an impact fee represents a necessary step towards ensuring that local communities receive revenue to offset the potential harms and challenges posed by pipelines. Conversely, there may be concerns from some stakeholders about whether the fees collected will be sufficient or appropriately managed to address environmental and community health risks associated with pipeline operations.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB740 include the specific fee structure and the definitions of what constitutes an 'impact pipeline.' Some may argue that the measure should include stricter regulations on pipeline operators to ensure comprehensive protection for local communities. Additionally, the potential impacts of increased fees on pipeline operators and whether these costs will be passed down to consumers could become a focal point for debate, raising questions about balancing economic interests with the needs of affected localities.