Pennsylvania House Bill HB929

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/17/23
• Refer: 4/17/23

Caption

In Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, further providing for parole power.

Impact

The amendments proposed in HB 929 could have substantial effects on parole procedures in Pennsylvania. By mandating telephone landlines for electronic monitoring, the bill may influence the eligibility of certain offenders for parole based on their living conditions. Consequently, this could lead to delays in release for individuals unable to meet the new requirements, as the availability of landlines may not be consistent across all neighborhoods. The measure underscores a shift towards stricter supervision of parolees in an effort to maintain public safety.

Summary

House Bill 929 aims to amend the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes regarding parole processes by introducing a requirement for electronic monitoring devices. Specifically, the bill stipulates that individuals released on parole must have access to a functioning telephone landline at their residences to ensure the proper functioning of electronic monitoring devices. This legislation is designed to enhance the oversight of parolees, ensuring that they can be monitored effectively upon their release from correctional institutions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 929 appears to be cautious but generally supportive among lawmakers focused on public safety. Proponents argue that the implementation of electronic monitoring is a necessary precaution that allows for better management of parolees and reduction of recidivism. However, there are concerns over the potential inequity this creates, particularly for individuals in areas without reliable access to telephone landlines, which could disproportionately affect lower-income communities.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding the bill include discussions about its practicality and fairness. Opponents might argue that the requirement for a landline could limit parole opportunities and that the reliance on technology could inadvertently disadvantage those in underprivileged areas, raising questions about access to resources. Furthermore, the implications of such mandatory monitoring may invoke debates around privacy rights and the principle of rehabilitation within the justice system.