Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB1

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/6/23
• Refer: 1/6/23
• Refer: 1/10/23
• Report Pass: 1/10/23
• Refer: 1/11/23
• Report Pass: 1/11/23
• Engrossed: 1/11/23
• Refer: 3/1/23
• Refer: 3/13/23
• Report Pass: 4/21/23
• Refer: 5/3/23
• Report Pass: 5/22/23
• Refer: 6/5/23

Caption

A Joint Resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, further providing for courts to be open and suits against the Commonwealth.

Impact

If enacted, SB1 would fundamentally alter how the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania addresses legal actions against itself, enhancing access to justice for individuals who have been wronged. By amending the requirements relating to suits against the Commonwealth, the bill aims to expand the scope of legal recourse available, particularly in the context of childhood sexual abuse. Moreover, it revises the qualifications for voters, making them more stringent, which could affect voter turnout and participation.

Summary

Senate Bill 1 (SB1) proposes a series of amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The bill outlines key provisions including the opening of courts for all individuals seeking justice, the framework for suits against the Commonwealth, and adjustments to the qualifications of electors. A significant aspect of the proposed amendments is the inclusion of a specific clause allowing individuals whose claims were previously limited by statutory caps or immunities to pursue actions regarding childhood sexual abuse within a two-year window following the amendment's effectiveness.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1 is mixed, reflecting the complexities and sensitivities of the issues it addresses. Advocates of the bill, likely believing in the need for improved judicial access and accountability for the Commonwealth, praise the amendments as steps toward justice and equality. Conversely, critics express caution regarding the potential implications of the amendments on legal processes and feel that the tightening of electoral qualifications may disenfranchise certain voter demographics.

Contention

Notable points of contention in the discussions around SB1 include the debate over the amendment concerning suits against the Commonwealth, particularly in how it aligns with or challenges existing sovereign immunity doctrines. Some legislators and stakeholders worry that expanding legal challenges could overburden the judicial system or lead to increased litigation costs for the state. Furthermore, the proposed qualifications for voters may spark criticism from advocacy groups concerned about accessibility and equity in voting rights.