Providing for regulatory review and for regulatory reduction pilot program; and making an editorial change.
If enacted, SB259 would significantly impact regulations governing occupational licensing and other agency-administered compliance measures within Pennsylvania. By requiring pilot agencies to report on the elimination or modification of regulations, the bill intends to encourage a streamlined approach to governance that minimizes red tape. This could potentially open up more career opportunities for returning citizens by easing the re-entry process into the workforce, especially those whose employment options are restricted by excessive licensing requirements.
Senate Bill 259, known as the Fighting Chance Act, seeks to amend Title 71 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes to establish a regulatory review and reduction pilot program. This program is specifically aimed at reducing unnecessary regulatory requirements to facilitate easier access to employment for small business owners, workers, and formerly incarcerated individuals. The bill sets a notable goal of achieving a 25% reduction in regulations and regulatory burdens within a three-year timeframe. The intent is to create a more conducive environment for individuals who face barriers to employment due to licensing requirements.
The sentiment surrounding SB259 is generally supportive among proponents who advocate for reducing barriers to employment, particularly for vulnerable populations. Supporters argue that the bill aligns with economic development goals by fostering an environment where entrepreneurship can thrive. However, there may be concerns balancing regulation with the need for safeguards in public health and safety, especially in occupational licensing areas where standards are critical. Critics may argue that the push for reduction should not compromise necessary regulations that ensure public safety.
Notable contention may arise around what constitutes 'unnecessary' regulation and the impact of such reductions on public oversight and safety. Lawmakers must navigate the fine line between deregulation that promotes business and employment, and maintaining the essential standards that protect consumers and the workforce. There is also concern over the potential burden on agencies tasked with implementing these reductions and ensuring compliance with federal and state mandates.