Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB379

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/9/23
• Refer: 2/9/23
• Engrossed: 3/8/23
• Refer: 3/8/23
• Refer: 3/25/24

Caption

Providing for protection of State-owned electronic devices and networks from applications controlled by foreign adversaries.

Impact

If enacted, SB 379 would significantly amend Title 71 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes by codifying prohibitions against specific unauthorized applications on state-owned electronic devices and networks. This legislative change aims to mitigate risks of data breaches or espionage that may arise from using applications controlled by foreign entities. The law would allow for exceptions for law enforcement and security-related activities, ensuring that necessary operations are not hindered by these restrictions. The enactment of this bill may result in state agencies needing to review and potentially revise their technology usage policies to comply with the new regulations.

Summary

Senate Bill 379 seeks to enhance the protection of state-owned electronic devices and networks from applications controlled by foreign adversaries, specifically targeting the popular social media platform TikTok among others. The bill prohibits the installation and use of unauthorized applications on state-owned devices and through state-owned networks. It introduces definitions pertaining to unauthorized applications and establishes clear prohibitions expected to enhance information security in state-operated environments. The bill's primary focus appears to be on safeguarding state resources from potential risks associated with foreign technology, particularly regarding data privacy and security.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 379 is generally supportive among lawmakers who emphasize the need to protect sensitive data from foreign threats. Proponents express that the bill aligns with ongoing national security efforts to combat potential spying and data compromise through foreign applications. However, there may be some contention regarding the implementation of such prohibitions and their effect on communication and information-sharing platforms officials might find essential. Critics might argue that such restrictions could impede access to valuable digital resources and limit engagement with constituents on popular platforms like TikTok.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from the bill's targeted prohibition of specific applications, as critics argue that this overreaches in regulating technology access in state operations. Concerns have been raised about the implications for employees who may wish to use these platforms for work-related communications or outreach. There may also be debate regarding the bill's vagueness in defining 'foreign adversaries' and how broadly it applies, leading to discussions about its potential impact on employee productivity and the state's relationship with technology companies.