In terms and courses of study, providing for parental control relating to instructional materials and books containing sexually explicit content.
The proposed legislation will impact state laws by requiring school entities to develop transparent policies regarding what constitutes sexually explicit content. Schools will need to identify materials and texts that contain such content and establish procedures for parental opt-in, whereby a student's access to these materials will depend on the parent's approval. This might lead to changes in how schools curate their library and instructional resources, particularly affecting the availability of certain books and educational materials deemed explicit.
Senate Bill 7 (SB7) seeks to amend the Public School Code of 1949 in Pennsylvania by establishing parental control over instructional materials and library books containing sexually explicit content. The bill mandates that school entities create and implement a public policy that allows parents or legal guardians to review and approve educational content that may be deemed inappropriate for students. The aim is to ensure that parents have a significant say in their children's exposure to material that could be considered sexually explicit.
The sentiment around SB7 appears to be polarized. Supporters argue that the bill empowers parents, allowing them to safeguard their children from inappropriate content and maintain control over their education. They believe this increases transparency and accountability within educational institutions. Conversely, opponents express concern that the bill could limit educational resources available to students and infringe on the professional judgment of educators. Critics fear that it may suppress valuable discussions surrounding sexual health and consent that are crucial for comprehensive education.
Notable points of contention include the potential subjective interpretation of what qualifies as sexually explicit content and the process by which schools will implement the opt-in policy. There are fears that this could lead to censorship or the unjust removal of important educational materials that meet educational standards but may touch upon sensitive subjects. Additionally, the requirement for schools to hold public forums for policy input raises questions about the effectiveness of community involvement and whether it will genuinely reflect diverse perspectives within the larger school community.