In storm water management plans and facilities, further providing for fees.
One significant aspect of SB 804 is its provision relating to agricultural properties. The bill limits the fees that can be imposed on agricultural land that has a low percentage of impervious surfaces and establishes a cap based on the median assessment fees levied across the township. This is intended to provide some financial relief to farmers while ensuring that they still contribute to the overall storm water management efforts. Additionally, the bill aims to unify the fee structures across local governments while allowing them some flexibility in their assessment procedures.
Senate Bill 804 aims to amend existing regulations regarding the assessment of fees related to storm water management in Pennsylvania. The bill specifically focuses on how townships can levy fees for the funding, construction, maintenance, and operation of storm water management facilities and plans. It introduces provisions that allow townships to create reasonable and uniform fees, which must not exceed federal or state minimum requirements. The bill also emphasizes the need to consider exemptions or credits for properties that have implemented approved storm water management practices.
The overall sentiment surrounding SB 804 appears to be supportive, particularly among legislators who recognize the importance of effective storm water management without placing undue financial burdens on farmers. However, there may be some contention regarding how these fees are implemented and the potential implications for local governance. Advocates of the bill argue that it provides a necessary framework to balance environmental responsibilities with economic concerns, particularly in rural areas.
Despite its positive reception, SB 804 could face challenges related to its retroactive application to January 1, 2020, and its implications on local autonomy in managing storm water regulations. Some local officials may express concerns about the limitations imposed on fee assessments, questioning whether this could hinder their ability to adequately fund necessary storm water infrastructure projects. As the bill progresses, discussions are likely to focus on balancing local needs with state regulations while ensuring compliance with federal environmental laws.