Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB851

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/26/23
• Refer: 6/26/23
• Refer: 6/30/23
• Report Pass: 9/20/23
• Engrossed: 10/3/23
• Refer: 10/3/23
• Refer: 10/16/23
• Report Pass: 10/18/23
• Refer: 10/18/23
• Report Pass: 10/23/23
• Enrolled: 10/23/23
• Chaptered: 10/23/23
• Passed: 10/23/23

Caption

In rules of the road in general, further providing for enforcement of failure to stop for school bus with flashing red lights; imposing a penalty; and making an editorial change.

Impact

The legislation creates a framework for local school entities to deploy automated systems to enforce traffic violations pertaining to school bus safety. This act specifically outlines the procedures for issuing violations, collecting fines, and contesting charges. Local jurisdictions entering agreements with law enforcement are granted authority to implement these systems, thereby centralizing accountability for school bus safety and potentially standardizing enforcement across the state. Additionally, a portion of the fines collected will be allocated to a school bus safety grant program, aiming to enhance educational and operational support for safer school transport.

Summary

Senate Bill 851 focuses on enhancing the enforcement of laws regarding stopping for school buses displaying flashing red lights. The bill proposes amendments to Title 75 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, introducing penalties for violators and allowing for the implementation of automated enforcement systems, such as side stop signal arm enforcement systems. The intent is to improve the safety of children while boarding or alighting from school buses by ensuring rigorous enforcement of stopping laws.

Sentiment

The reaction to SB851 has been predominantly supportive among proponents, primarily legislators and education advocates who believe that the bill will bolster student safety and reduce the prevalence of violations. However, there are concerns raised about the potential overreliance on technology for enforcement, as some critics argue that it could infringe upon driver rights and local control over traffic enforcement. The community sentiment is thus somewhat polarized, with strong advocacy for enhanced child safety measures countered by fears of administrative overreach.

Contention

Key points of contention include discussions around the fairness of automated enforcement, particularly regarding the dismissal of violations and the confidentiality of personal data collected through these systems. Critics emphasize the need for human oversight in law enforcement processes to prevent potential errors and unjust penalties. Moreover, the maximum fines and the allocation of collected funds have been areas of debate, with some advocating for clearer guidelines on how funds will benefit school districts and the communities they serve.