Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

Pennsylvania House Bill HB1184

Introduced
4/9/25  

Caption

Imposing a moratorium on enactment of new or expanded health insurance policy mandated benefits; and requiring the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to study the issue of health insurance mandates and report to the General Assembly.

Impact

The implementation of HB 1184 is expected to affect the dynamics of health insurance regulations in Pennsylvania significantly. Specifically, it halts any potential growth in coverage requirements that could increase health insurance premiums for consumers and insurers alike. The committee is tasked with evaluating current mandates and their cost implications, which could lead to recommendations that shape future health policy legislation. The findings of this study, required by the bill, are to be reported by the end of 2026, potentially influencing the future of health insurance coverage in the state.

Summary

House Bill 1184, known as the State-mandated Benefit Moratorium Act, seeks to impose a moratorium on the enactment of new or expanded mandated benefits in health insurance policies in Pennsylvania. This legislative action intends to pause any legislation that would require health insurers to provide additional coverage beyond federally mandated measures. The bill stipulates that the hesitation is in place until the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee conducts a thorough study on the existing mandated benefits and their implications on the state’s health insurance landscape.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding HB 1184 are likely to be mixed, reflecting a broader debate about health care coverage and costs. Proponents may argue that a moratorium is necessary to prevent the escalation of costs associated with new mandated benefits, which can place a heavier burden on both insurers and consumers. Conversely, opponents might express concern that halting the introduction of new mandated benefits could impede access to necessary health services and undermine important health care reforms aimed at improving population health outcomes.

Contention

A notable point of contention revolves around the moratorium's restriction on new health mandates. While aimed at stabilizing costs, critics might argue that it could lead to gaps in coverage for essential health services that are not adequately addressed by existing mandates. This tension highlights the ongoing challenge of balancing the needs for comprehensive health coverage against controlling insurance premiums and costs, a critical discussion as Pennsylvania navigates its health care policies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ AR96

Changes membership of Budget and Labor Committees; clarifies that bill or resolution may be listed on committee agenda for purposes of amendment.

MI HB4870

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MI HB4326

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MN HC6

A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.

CA SB602

Advisory bodies.

CA SB1048

Advisory bodies.

CA AB3239

Advisory bodies.

KS HR6003

Providing temporary rules of the House of Representatives for the 2023 session until permanent rules are adopted.