Pennsylvania House Bill HB1261

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/17/25
• Refer: 4/17/25
• Refer: 6/30/25
• Report Pass: 7/1/25
• Engrossed: 7/1/25
• Refer: 7/15/25

Caption

In Commonwealth services, providing for protection against PFAS chemicals and for firefighting protective equipment; in grants to fire companies and emergency medical services

Impact

The impact of HB 1261 is significant for both environmental and public health considerations as it seeks to eliminate harmful chemicals from firefighting operations within the Commonwealth. The legislation intends to align state practices with growing public health concerns regarding the risks associated with PFAS. It not only aims to improve safety for firefighters but also addresses broader environmental contamination linked to PFAS, establishing a framework for responsible usage and management of firefighting materials. As a result, the bill could set a precedent for similar laws in other states, thereby influencing national standards for firefighting chemicals and practices.

Summary

House Bill 1261 focuses on the regulation of PFAS chemicals in firefighting foam and personal protective equipment used by firefighting entities. The bill mandates that beginning July 1, 2026, manufacturers are prohibited from producing or selling class B firefighting foam containing intentionally added PFAS chemicals. It also establishes clear responsibilities for the Office of the State Fire Commissioner in assisting firefighting entities with the transition to PFAS-free alternatives and developing plans for the disposal of existing stocks of PFAS-containing foam. Additionally, the bill encourages the use of grant funding to support fire companies and emergency medical services in acquiring safer equipment and addressing environmental concerns associated with PFAS.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 1261 appears to be supportive among environmental advocates and health professionals who see the bill as a necessary step toward reducing toxic exposures. Conversely, some opponents may express concerns about the feasibility of transitioning to alternative firefighting foams and the potential costs associated with these changes. Legislative discussions highlight a shared recognition of the need for safer fire management practices while also revealing apprehensions from various stakeholders about the implementation aspects of the new regulations.

Contention

Notable points of contention within discussions on HB 1261 include debates regarding the timeline for phasing out PFAS-containing products and how to adequately fund the transition for firefighting entities. Although many support the reduction of harmful chemicals, there are concerns about ensuring that fire departments have access to effective alternatives without compromising their operational capabilities. Discussions have also emphasized the importance of balancing environmental health with the practical realities of firefighting and emergency response, making it a multifaceted issue that requires careful consideration.