Updating and expanding the storm water planning requirements to be undertaken by counties; authorizing counties to regulate storm water within a watershed-based planning area; authorizing the formation of water resources management authorities; enabling counties, municipalities and water resources management authorities to develop integrated water resources management plans; imposing duties and conferring powers on the Department of Environmental Protection, the Environmental Quality Board, counties, municipalities and water resources management authorities; providing for financing and for waiver of use for certain grant or loan funds; establishing the Integrated Water Resources Management Account; and making repeals.
The significance of this bill lies in its intent to enhance the regulatory framework for storm water management, which currently faces challenges from insufficient coordinated planning across various jurisdictions. By permitting counties and local authorities to formulate their water resource management strategies, the legislation aims to address pressing issues like flood control, pollution, and strain on water infrastructures resulting from urban development. It is expected to lead to better long-term management solutions that are environmentally sustainable and tailored to specific watershed needs.
House Bill 659, also known as the Integrated Water Resources Restoration, Protection and Management Act, introduces comprehensive updates and expansions to storm water planning requirements throughout Pennsylvania. It authorizes counties to oversee storm water management within designated watershed-based planning areas, allowing for the establishment of water resource management authorities. The bill seeks to implement integrated water resource management plans that encompass the coordination of efforts across state, county, and municipal levels to better manage and protect natural water resources and ensure compliance with existing laws such as the Clean Streams Law.
The general sentiment around HB 659 is one of cautious optimism among proponents who recognize the growing urgency for effective storm water and water resource management. Advocates argue that the bill is a step towards progressive environmental protection and public health safety. However, there are concerns expressed by some stakeholders regarding potential funding limitations and the effectiveness of implementation without adequate resources. The bill's critics fear it might not address existing inequities in environmental resource management and highlight the need for broader community engagement in planning processes.
Notable points of contention surrounding HB 659 include the potential for conflicts among counties and municipalities regarding jurisdiction over water resource management and the implications of relying on dedicated state funding. Opponents, including some local environmental groups, worry that the newly established authorities may centralize control and diminish community involvement in decision-making. Moreover, skepticism remains about ensuring consistent enforcement and compliance among various local entities, particularly regarding the balancing of development and environmental sustainability objectives.