Pennsylvania House Bill HR179

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/4/25
• Refer: 4/4/25

Caption

Urging The Pennsylvania State University and its President to use transparency in closing any of its Commonwealth campuses.

Impact

The potential closure of 12 Commonwealth campuses, as indicated by university administration, poses significant challenges for local communities. Resolutions like HR179 emphasize the need for thorough community engagement and transparency, ensuring all stakeholders, including students, faculty, and local residents, are considered in the decision-making process. The proposed changes may lead to reduced educational, cultural, and economic resources within these communities, negatively impacting job availability and local spending.

Summary

House Resolution 179 urges The Pennsylvania State University and its President to prioritize transparency in the decision-making process regarding the potential closure of any Commonwealth campuses. The resolution highlights the critical role these campuses play in providing educational opportunities, especially to residents in rural and underserved areas of Pennsylvania. The impending closures, if enacted, could greatly diminish access to affordable higher education, which has been a cornerstone of the university's mission since its establishment as the state's land-grant institution.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR179 appears to reflect a strong desire for accountability and open communication from university leadership. Supporters of the resolution likely believe that maintaining transparency is essential for public trust in the university's commitment to its land-grant mission. Tasked with educating over 3 million Pennsylvanians, many community members, and social stakeholders see this resolution as a necessary step toward protecting educational access and resources, while opponents might express concerns regarding the necessity of any campus closures.

Contention

As the resolution emphasizes the importance of using transparent criteria when deciding on the closure of campuses, it touches on a broader conflict between cost-saving measures and the institution's responsibility to its student body and surrounding communities. Notable points of contention may arise not only around the closures themselves but around the methods of communication and the criteria for such decisions. How the university proceeds in this context could significantly influence public perception and community relations moving forward.