Amending House Rule 24, further providing for third consideration and final passage bills.
If adopted, HR73 would directly affect the efficiency and transparency of the legislative process in the Pennsylvania House. It aims to promote a clearer understanding of when and how bills can be amended before final votes are taken. This could lead to fewer last-minute changes to bills, allowing legislators and the public adequate time to review proposed legislation. The emphasis on reducing ambiguity in the legislative process aims to foster greater confidence in the decision-making of the House and its representatives.
House Resolution 73 (HR73) proposes an amendment to House Rule 24 regarding the consideration of bills during legislative sessions, specifically addressing third consideration and final passage procedures. The resolution seeks to clarify and refine the circumstances under which amendments can be made to bills during their third consideration. By introducing stricter guidelines, HR73 aims to ensure that bills undergo a thorough review process before final passage, enhancing the legislative procedure's overall integrity and efficiency.
The overall sentiment surrounding HR73 is generally supportive among those who emphasize the importance of a structured legislative process. Proponents are likely to argue that the changes will enhance legislative quality and accountability. However, there may be concerns from some members about the potential for reduced flexibility in addressing necessary amendments during the critical final stages of a bill's consideration, indicating a nuanced view of the proposed changes.
Notable points of contention may arise around the proposed limitations on amending bills during the third consideration stage. Opponents may argue that strict rules could hinder timely adjustments to legislation that reflect evolving circumstances or public feedback. Supporters counter that by streamlining the amendment process, HR73 will prevent chaotic last-minute changes that could undermine the legislative intent or mislead stakeholders regarding the final language of bills being voted on.